IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v44y2021i1d10.1007_s40264-020-00993-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Introduction or Discontinuation of Additional Risk Minimisation Measures During the Life Cycle of Medicines in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Reynold D. C. Francisca

    (Erasmus Medical Centre, Department of Medical Informatics
    Medicines Evaluation Board, Department of Pharmacovigilance)

  • Emna Baba

    (Medicines Evaluation Board, Department of Pharmacovigilance)

  • Christina E. Hoeve

    (Erasmus Medical Centre, Department of Medical Informatics
    Medicines Evaluation Board, Department of Pharmacovigilance)

  • Inge M. Zomerdijk

    (Erasmus Medical Centre, Department of Medical Informatics
    Medicines Evaluation Board, Department of Pharmacovigilance)

  • Miriam C. J. M. Sturkenboom

    (University Medical Centre Utrecht, Julius Global Health)

  • Sabine M. J. M. Straus

    (Erasmus Medical Centre, Department of Medical Informatics
    Medicines Evaluation Board, Department of Pharmacovigilance)

Abstract

Introduction Additional risk minimisation measures (aRMMs) may be required to minimise important risks of medicines. aRMMs may be required at the time of authorisation, but may also be introduced or discontinued during the product life cycle as new safety information arises. The aim of this study is to describe post-authorisation introductions of new aRMMs and discontinuations of existing aRMMs for medicines authorised in the European Union (EU). Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study that included all new active substances authorised through the EU centralised procedure between January 1st 2006 and December 31st 2017. Data was extracted from European Public Assessment Reports available on the website of the European Medicines Agency (ema.europa.eu). Medicines were followed up from the date of marketing authorisation (MA) until first introduction or discontinuation of aRMMs, excluding Direct Healthcare Professional Communications (DHPCs), withdrawal/suspension/revocation of the MA, or July 1st 2018, when data extraction took place. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse frequency data, and survival analysis was used to calculate 5- and 10-year probability of introduction or discontinuation of aRMMs. Results A total of 476 medicines were authorised during the study period. The probability of getting aRMMs after authorisation for products authorised without aRMMs was 3.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2–5.7] within 5 years after authorisation and 6.9% (95% CI 2.6–11) within 10 years after authorisation. For products authorised with aRMMs, the probability of discontinuation of aRMMs was 0.9% (95% CI 0–2.6) within 5 years and 8.3% (95% CI 0–16.1) within 10 years after authorisation. Conclusions We found low probabilities of introduction and discontinuation of aRMMs (excluding DHPCs) during the product life cycle for medicines authorised between 2006 and 2017. The low rate of discontinuation may potentially be due to a lack of robust data on effectiveness of aRMMs. Further research is needed to get more insight into the dynamics of aRMMs during the medicine life cycle.

Suggested Citation

  • Reynold D. C. Francisca & Emna Baba & Christina E. Hoeve & Inge M. Zomerdijk & Miriam C. J. M. Sturkenboom & Sabine M. J. M. Straus, 2021. "Introduction or Discontinuation of Additional Risk Minimisation Measures During the Life Cycle of Medicines in Europe," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 63-72, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:44:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s40264-020-00993-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-020-00993-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-020-00993-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-020-00993-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:44:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s40264-020-00993-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.