IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v44y2021i11d10.1007_s40264-021-01103-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying Actionability as a Key Factor for the Adoption of ‘Intelligent’ Systems for Drug Safety: Lessons Learned from a User-Centred Design Approach

Author

Listed:
  • George I. Gavriilidis

    (Institute of Applied Biosciences, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas)

  • Vlasios K. Dimitriadis

    (Institute of Applied Biosciences, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas)

  • Marie-Christine Jaulent

    (Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Univ Paris 13, Laboratoire d’Informatique Médicale et d’Ingénierie des Connaissances pour la e-Santé, LIMICS)

  • Pantelis Natsiavas

    (Institute of Applied Biosciences, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas
    Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Univ Paris 13, Laboratoire d’Informatique Médicale et d’Ingénierie des Connaissances pour la e-Santé, LIMICS)

Abstract

Introduction Information technology (IT) plays an important role in the healthcare landscape via the increasing digitization of medical data and the use of modern computational paradigms such as machine learning (ML) and knowledge graphs (KGs). These ‘intelligent’ technical paradigms provide a new digital ‘toolkit’ supporting drug safety and healthcare processes, including ‘active pharmacovigilance’. While these technical paradigms are promising, intelligent systems (ISs) are not yet widely adopted by pharmacovigilance (PV) stakeholders, namely the pharma industry, academia/research community, drug safety monitoring organizations, regulatory authorities, and healthcare institutions. The limitations obscuring the integration of ISs into PV activities are multifaceted, involving technical, legal and medical hurdles, and thus require further elucidation. Objective We dissect the abovementioned limitations by describing the lessons learned during the design and implementation of the PVClinical platform, a web platform aiming to support the investigation of potential adverse drug reactions (ADRs), emphasizing the use of knowledge engineering (KE) as its main technical paradigm. Results To this end, we elaborate on the related ‘business processes’ (i.e. operational processes) and ‘user goals’ identified as part of the PVClinical platform design process based on Design Thinking principles. We also elaborate on key challenges restricting the adoption of such ISs and their integration in the clinical setting and beyond. Conclusions We highlight the fact that beyond providing analytics and useful statistics to the end user, ‘actionability’ has emerged as the operational priority identified through the whole process. Furthermore, we focus on the needs for valid, reproducible, explainable and human-interpretable results, stressing the need to emphasize on usability.

Suggested Citation

  • George I. Gavriilidis & Vlasios K. Dimitriadis & Marie-Christine Jaulent & Pantelis Natsiavas, 2021. "Identifying Actionability as a Key Factor for the Adoption of ‘Intelligent’ Systems for Drug Safety: Lessons Learned from a User-Centred Design Approach," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 44(11), pages 1165-1178, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:44:y:2021:i:11:d:10.1007_s40264-021-01103-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-021-01103-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-021-01103-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-021-01103-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:44:y:2021:i:11:d:10.1007_s40264-021-01103-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.