IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v43y2020i7d10.1007_s40264-020-00923-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rates and Costs of Dispensing Naloxone to Patients at High Risk for Opioid Overdose in the United States, 2014–2018

Author

Listed:
  • Rachel E. Barenie

    (Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School)

  • Joshua J. Gagne

    (Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School)

  • Aaron S. Kesselheim

    (Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School)

  • Ajinkya Pawar

    (Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School)

  • Angela Tong

    (Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School)

  • Jing Luo

    (Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School)

  • Brian T. Bateman

    (Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School
    Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School)

Abstract

Introduction Clinical practice guidelines recommend co-prescribing naloxone to patients at high risk of opioid overdose, but few such patients receive naloxone. High costs of naloxone may contribute to limited dispensing. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate rates and costs of dispensing naloxone to patients receiving opioid prescriptions and at high risk for opioid overdose. Methods Using claims data from a large US commercial insurance company, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of new opioid initiators between January 2014 and December 2018. We identified patients at high risk for overdose defined as a diagnosis of opioid use disorder, prior overdose, an opioid prescription of ≥ 50 mg morphine equivalents/day for ≥ 90 days, and/or concurrent benzodiazepine prescriptions. Results Among 5,292,098 new opioid initiators, 616,444 (12%) met criteria for high risk of overdose during follow-up, and, of those, 3096 (0.5%) were dispensed naloxone. The average copayment was US$24.83 for naloxone (standard deviation [SD] 67.66) versus US$9.74 for the index opioid (SD 19.75). The average deductible was US$6.18 for naloxone (SD 27.32) versus US$3.74 for the index opioid (SD 25.56), with 94% and 88% having deductibles of US$0 for their naloxone and opioid prescriptions, respectively. The average out-of-pocket cost was US$31.01 for naloxone (SD 73.64) versus US$13.48 for the index opioid (SD 34.95). Conclusions Rates of dispensing naloxone to high risk patients were extremely low, and prescription costs varied greatly. Since improving naloxone’s affordability may increase access, whether naloxone’s high cost is associated with low dispensing rates should be evaluated.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachel E. Barenie & Joshua J. Gagne & Aaron S. Kesselheim & Ajinkya Pawar & Angela Tong & Jing Luo & Brian T. Bateman, 2020. "Rates and Costs of Dispensing Naloxone to Patients at High Risk for Opioid Overdose in the United States, 2014–2018," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 43(7), pages 669-675, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:43:y:2020:i:7:d:10.1007_s40264-020-00923-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-020-00923-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-020-00923-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-020-00923-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:43:y:2020:i:7:d:10.1007_s40264-020-00923-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.