IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v43y2020i4d10.1007_s40264-020-00904-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Integrated Analysis of the Safety of Tofacitinib in Psoriatic Arthritis across Phase III and Long-Term Extension Studies with Comparison to Real-World Observational Data

Author

Listed:
  • Gerd R. Burmester

    (Charité – University Medicine Berlin)

  • Jeffrey R. Curtis

    (University of Alabama at Birmingham)

  • Huifeng Yun

    (University of Alabama at Birmingham)

  • Oliver FitzGerald

    (St Vincent’s University Hospital)

  • Kevin L. Winthrop

    (Oregon Health and Science University)

  • Valderilio F. Azevedo

    (Universidade Federal do Paraná)

  • William F. C. Rigby

    (Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth)

  • Keith S. Kanik

    (Pfizer Inc)

  • Cunshan Wang

    (Pfizer Inc)

  • Pinaki Biswas

    (Pfizer Inc)

  • Thomas Jones

    (Pfizer Inc)

  • Niki Palmetto

    (Pfizer Inc)

  • Thijs Hendrikx

    (Pfizer Inc)

  • Sujatha Menon

    (Pfizer Inc)

  • Ricardo Rojo

    (Pfizer Inc)

Abstract

Introduction Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Objective Our objective was to compare the incidence rates (IRs) of adverse events in tofacitinib clinical trials and real-world observational data for alternative treatments. Methods The tofacitinib “dose-comparison cohort” included months 0–12 of two phase III studies (tofacitinib 5 [n = 238] and 10 [n = 236] mg twice daily [BID]); the “all-tofacitinib comparison cohort” (n = 783) included two phase III and one ongoing long-term extension study (data cutoff May 2016). An “observational comparison cohort” (n = 5799) comprised patients initiating a conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD), biologic DMARD, or apremilast in the US Truven MarketScan database from 2010 to 2015. IRs for serious infections (SIEs; requiring hospitalization), herpes zoster (HZ), malignancies (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer [NMSC]), NMSC, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) across cohorts were qualitatively compared. Results IRs (patients with events/100 patient-years) for SIEs were similar between the tofacitinib dose-comparison cohort (5 mg BID: 1.3; 10 mg BID: 2.0) and the observational comparison cohort (1.1–7.9; treatment dependent). The tofacitinib dose-comparison cohort had a higher rate of HZ (5 mg BID: 2.0; 10 mg BID: 2.7) than did the observational comparison cohort (0.8–2.0). IRs for NMSC were generally lower in the all-tofacitinib comparison cohort (0.5) than in the observational comparison cohort (0.4–6.0). IRs for MACE, malignancies excluding NMSC, and NMSC were similar between cohorts. Conclusion In patients with PsA, tofacitinib had a safety profile similar to that of other systemic therapies in real-world settings, except for the risk of HZ, a known risk of tofacitinib. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01877668; NCT01882439; NCT01976364.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerd R. Burmester & Jeffrey R. Curtis & Huifeng Yun & Oliver FitzGerald & Kevin L. Winthrop & Valderilio F. Azevedo & William F. C. Rigby & Keith S. Kanik & Cunshan Wang & Pinaki Biswas & Thomas Jones, 2020. "An Integrated Analysis of the Safety of Tofacitinib in Psoriatic Arthritis across Phase III and Long-Term Extension Studies with Comparison to Real-World Observational Data," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 379-392, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:43:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s40264-020-00904-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-020-00904-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-020-00904-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-020-00904-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:43:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s40264-020-00904-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.