IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v43y2020i1d10.1007_s40264-019-00874-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Description of the Risk Management of Medication Errors for Centrally Authorised Products in the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Christina E. Hoeve

    (Medicines Evaluation Board
    Erasmus Medical Center)

  • Reynold D. C. Francisca

    (Medicines Evaluation Board
    Erasmus Medical Center)

  • Inge Zomerdijk

    (Medicines Evaluation Board
    Erasmus Medical Center)

  • Miriam C. J. M. Sturkenboom

    (University Utrecht Medical Center)

  • Sabine M. J. M. Straus

    (Medicines Evaluation Board
    Erasmus Medical Center)

Abstract

Introduction Medication errors can have serious consequences for patients. To prevent the occurrence of medication errors in clinical practice, safety concerns may be included in the risk management plan and subsequently be addressed with routine and/or additional risk minimisation measures. Objective This study aims to describe safety concerns around medication errors and the risk minimisation measures for centrally authorised products in the European Union. Methods All safety concerns included in the risk management plans of originator centrally authorised products, authorised between 1 January, 2010 and 31 December, 2017, were collected from the European Public Assessment Report registry. Medication error safety concerns were categorised by Anatomical Therapeutic Classification code, year of authorisation, type of medication error and type of risk minimisation measure. Results During the study period, 311 centrally authorised products were approved, of which 84 had at least one medication error safety concern. The proportion of centrally authorised products with medication error safety concerns showed variation between 2010 and 2017 ranging from 15.2% to 36.4%. In total, 95 medication error safety concerns were identified. The type of medication error was highly variable, drug administration error was listed most frequently (n = 17). For 27 out of 95 medication error safety concerns, corresponding to 23 centrally authorised products, additional risk minimisation measures were required. All additional risk minimisation measures consisted of educational material targeted at healthcare professionals (85.2%) and/or patients (51.9%). For 78.3% of centrally authorised products with additional risk minimisation measures for medication errors, studies to evaluate the effectiveness of the additional risk minimisation measures were agreed upon. Conclusions Medication error safety concerns were listed for almost a quarter of centrally authorised products approved during the study period. Further research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness and continued need for additional risk minimisation measures for medication errors.

Suggested Citation

  • Christina E. Hoeve & Reynold D. C. Francisca & Inge Zomerdijk & Miriam C. J. M. Sturkenboom & Sabine M. J. M. Straus, 2020. "Description of the Risk Management of Medication Errors for Centrally Authorised Products in the European Union," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 45-55, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:43:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s40264-019-00874-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-019-00874-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-019-00874-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-019-00874-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:43:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s40264-019-00874-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.