IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v42y2019i6d10.1007_s40264-018-00794-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Machine-Learning Algorithm to Optimise Automated Adverse Drug Reaction Detection from Clinical Coding

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher McMaster

    (Austin Health
    University of Melbourne)

  • David Liew

    (Austin Health
    University of Melbourne)

  • Claire Keith

    (Austin Health)

  • Parnaz Aminian

    (Austin Health)

  • Albert Frauman

    (Austin Health
    University of Melbourne)

Abstract

Introduction Adverse drug reaction (ADR) detection in hospitals is heavily reliant on spontaneous reporting by clinical staff, with studies in the literature pointing to high rates of underreporting [1]. International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes have been used in epidemiological studies of ADRs and offer the potential for automated ADR detection systems. Objective The aim of this study was to develop an automated ADR detection system based on ICD-10 codes, using machine-learning algorithms to improve accuracy and efficiency. Methods For a 12-month period from December 2016 to November 2017, every inpatient episode receiving an ICD-10 code in the range Y40.0–Y59.9 (ADR code) was flagged for review as a potential ADR. Each flagged admission was assessed by an expert pharmacist and, if needed, reviewed at regular ADR committee meetings. For each report, a determination was made about ADR probability and severity. The dataset was randomly split into training and test sets. A machine-learning model using the random forest algorithm was developed on the training set to discriminate between true and false ADR reports. The model was then applied to the test set to assess accuracy using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC). Results In the study period, 2917 Y40.0–Y59.9 codes were applied to admissions, resulting in 245 ADR reports after review. These 245 reports accounted for 44.5% of all ADR reporting in our hospital in the study period. A random forest model built on the training set was able to discriminate between true and false reports on the test set with an AUC of 0.803. Conclusions Automated ADR detection using ICD-10 coding significantly improved ADR detection in the study period, with improved discrimination between true and false reports by applying a machine-learning model.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher McMaster & David Liew & Claire Keith & Parnaz Aminian & Albert Frauman, 2019. "A Machine-Learning Algorithm to Optimise Automated Adverse Drug Reaction Detection from Clinical Coding," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 42(6), pages 721-725, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:42:y:2019:i:6:d:10.1007_s40264-018-00794-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-018-00794-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-018-00794-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-018-00794-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yiqing Zhao & Yue Yu & Hanyin Wang & Yikuan Li & Yu Deng & Guoqian Jiang & Yuan Luo, 2022. "Machine Learning in Causal Inference: Application in Pharmacovigilance," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 459-476, May.
    2. Heba Edrees & Wenyu Song & Ania Syrowatka & Aurélien Simona & Mary G. Amato & David W. Bates, 2022. "Intelligent Telehealth in Pharmacovigilance: A Future Perspective," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 449-458, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:42:y:2019:i:6:d:10.1007_s40264-018-00794-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.