IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v42y2019i3d10.1007_s40264-018-0738-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preventing Future Deaths from Medicines: Responses to Coroners’ Concerns in England and Wales

Author

Listed:
  • Robin E. Ferner

    (West Midlands Centre for Adverse Drug Reactions
    University of Birmingham)

  • Tohfa Ahmad

    (West Midlands Centre for Adverse Drug Reactions)

  • Zainab Babatunde

    (University of Birmingham)

  • Anthony R. Cox

    (West Midlands Centre for Adverse Drug Reactions
    University of Birmingham)

Abstract

Introduction Coroners inquire into sudden, unexpected, or unnatural deaths. We have previously established 99 cases (100 deaths) in England and Wales in which medicines or part of the medication process or both were mentioned in coroners’ ‘Regulation 28 Reports to Prevent Future Deaths’ (coroners’ reports). Objective We wished to see what responses were made by National Health Service (NHS) organizations and others to these 99 coroners’ reports. Methods Where possible, we identified the party or parties to whom these reports were addressed (names were occasionally redacted). We then sought responses, either from the UK judiciary website or by making requests to the addressee directly or, for NHS and government entities, under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. Responses were analysed by theme to indicate the steps taken to prevent future deaths. Results We were able to analyse one or more responses to 69/99 cases from 106 organizations. We analysed 201 separate actions proposed or taken to address the 160 concerns expressed by coroners. Staff education or training was the most common form of action taken (44/201). Some organisations made changes in process (24/201) or policy (17/201), and some felt existing policies were sufficient to address some concerns (22/201). Conclusions Coroners’ concerns are often of national importance but are not currently shared nationally. Only a minority of responses to coroners’ reports concerning medicines are in the public domain. Processes for auditing responses and assessing their effectiveness are opaque. Few of the responses appear to provide robust and generally applicable ways to prevent future deaths.

Suggested Citation

  • Robin E. Ferner & Tohfa Ahmad & Zainab Babatunde & Anthony R. Cox, 2019. "Preventing Future Deaths from Medicines: Responses to Coroners’ Concerns in England and Wales," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 445-451, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:42:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s40264-018-0738-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-018-0738-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-018-0738-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-018-0738-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robin E. Ferner & Craig Easton & Anthony R. Cox, 2018. "Deaths from Medicines: A Systematic Analysis of Coroners’ Reports to Prevent Future Deaths," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 103-110, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John S. Fountain & Andrew M. Tomlin & David M. Reith & Murray W. Tilyard, 2020. "Fatal Toxicity Indices for Medicine-Related Deaths in New Zealand, 2008–2013," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 223-232, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:42:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s40264-018-0738-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.