IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v42y2019i3d10.1007_s40264-018-0736-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implications of Individual QT/RR Profiles—Part 1: Inaccuracies and Problems of Population-Specific QT/Heart Rate Corrections

Author

Listed:
  • Marek Malik

    (National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College)

  • Christine Garnett

    (US Food and Drug Administration)

  • Katerina Hnatkova

    (National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College)

  • Jose Vicente

    (US Food and Drug Administration)

  • Lars Johannesen

    (US Food and Drug Administration)

  • Norman Stockbridge

    (US Food and Drug Administration)

Abstract

Introduction Universal QT correction formulas are potentially problematic in corrected QT (QTc) interval comparisons at different heart rates. Instead of individual-specific corrections, population-specific corrections are occasionally used based on QT/RR data pooled from all study subjects. Objective To investigate the performance of individual-specific and population-specific corrections, a statistical modeling study was performed using QT/RR data of 523 healthy subjects. Methods In each subject, full drug-free QT/RR profiles were available, characterized using non-linear regression models. In each subject, 50 baseline QT/RR readings represented baseline data of standard QT studies. Using these data, linear and log-linear heart rate corrections were optimized for each subject and for different groups of ten and 50 subjects. These corrections were applied in random combinations of heart rate changes between − 10 and + 25 beats per minute (bpm) and known QTc interval changes between − 25 and + 25 ms. Results Both the subject-specific and population-specific corrections based on the 50 baseline QT/RR readings tended to underestimate/overestimate the QTc interval changes when heart rate was increasing/decreasing, respectively. The result spread was much wider with population-specific corrections, making the estimates of QTc interval changes practically unpredictable. Conclusion Subject-specific heart rate corrections based on limited baseline drug-free data may lead to inconsistent results and, in the presence of underlying heart rate changes, may potentially underestimate or overestimate QTc interval changes. The population-specific corrections lead to results that are much more influenced by the combination of individual QT/RR patterns than by the actual QTc interval changes. Subject-specific heart rate corrections based on full profiles derived from drug-free baseline recordings with wide QT/RR distribution should be used when studying drugs expected to cause heart rate changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Marek Malik & Christine Garnett & Katerina Hnatkova & Jose Vicente & Lars Johannesen & Norman Stockbridge, 2019. "Implications of Individual QT/RR Profiles—Part 1: Inaccuracies and Problems of Population-Specific QT/Heart Rate Corrections," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 401-414, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:42:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s40264-018-0736-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-018-0736-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-018-0736-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-018-0736-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:42:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s40264-018-0736-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.