IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v42y2019i1d10.1007_s40264-018-0711-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stevens–Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis in Association with Commonly Prescribed Drugs in Outpatient Care Other than Anti-Epileptic Drugs and Antibiotics: A Population-Based Case–Control Study

Author

Listed:
  • Noel Frey

    (University of Basel
    University Hospital Basel)

  • Michael Bodmer

    (Cantonal Hospital)

  • Andreas Bircher

    (University Hospital Basel)

  • Susan S. Jick

    (Boston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Program
    Boston University School of Public Health)

  • Christoph R. Meier

    (University of Basel
    University Hospital Basel
    Boston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Program)

  • Julia Spoendlin

    (University of Basel
    University Hospital Basel)

Abstract

Introduction Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis have been associated with the use of various drugs, but evidence is scarce. We studied the association between new use of outpatient drugs other than anti-epileptic drugs and antibiotics and Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. Methods We conducted a matched (1:4) case–control analysis in 480 previously validated Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis cases (1995–2013). We calculated odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals for Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis in new users of drugs compared to non-users. For cases of Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis diagnosed ≤ 84 days after the first use of a drug, we assessed causality between drug exposure and Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis using ALDEN (algorithm of drug causality in epidermal necrolysis). We calculated absolute risks by dividing the number of Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis cases ≤ 84 days after new drug exposure by the total number of new users of the drug. Results There was an association between Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis and the use of allopurinol (odds ratio 24.51, 95% confidence interval 2.94–204.04) and cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors (odds ratio 24.19, 95% confidence interval 2.91–200.92). Proton pump inhibitors, fluoxetine, mirtazapine, and 5-aminosalicylates (sulfasalazine, mesalamine) were also associated with an increased risk of Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis, though with lower odds ratios. ALDEN score application suggests a likely causality for these associations. Absolute risks of Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis were 6.0/100,000 new users for allopurinol, and 1.9–4.3/100,000 new users for cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and 5-aminosalicylates, and 0.2–1.6/100,000 new users for proton pump inhibitors, fluoxetine, and mirtazapine. We found no association between Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis and oxicams, benzodiazepines, citalopram, sertraline, paroxetine, venlafaxine, and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors despite > 100,000 new users. Conclusions In this observational study, we observed likely causal associations between Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis and use of allopurinol, cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, and 5-aminosalicylates, and potential associations for proton pump inhibitors, fluoxetine, and mirtazapine.

Suggested Citation

  • Noel Frey & Michael Bodmer & Andreas Bircher & Susan S. Jick & Christoph R. Meier & Julia Spoendlin, 2019. "Stevens–Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis in Association with Commonly Prescribed Drugs in Outpatient Care Other than Anti-Epileptic Drugs and Antibiotics: A Population-Based Case–Contro," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 55-66, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:42:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s40264-018-0711-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-018-0711-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-018-0711-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-018-0711-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:42:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s40264-018-0711-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.