IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v42y2019i10d10.1007_s40264-019-00846-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Renal Stress Using Pharmacokinetic Urinary Biomarker Data in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Vancomycin and/or Piperacillin–Tazobactam: A Secondary Analysis of the Multicenter Sapphire Study

Author

Listed:
  • Sandra L. Kane-Gill

    (University of Pittsburgh
    Center for Critical Care Nephrology, University of Pittsburgh
    University of Pittsburgh)

  • Marlies Ostermann

    (King’s College London, Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital)

  • Jing Shi

    (Walker Bioscience)

  • Emily L. Joyce

    (Center for Critical Care Nephrology, University of Pittsburgh
    University of Pittsburgh
    UPMC Children’s Hospital)

  • John A. Kellum

    (Center for Critical Care Nephrology, University of Pittsburgh
    University of Pittsburgh)

Abstract

Introduction A drug combination that has gained recent attention for an additive risk of nephrotoxicity is vancomycin plus piperacillin–tazobactam. Clinicians need to better understand whether tubular cell stress occurs with piperacillin–tazobactam administration to establish whether renal injury associated with this combination is a valid clinical concern. Objective An evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of urinary tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 (TIMP-2) and insulin-like growth factor binding-protein 7 (IGFBP7) for patients receiving vancomycin alone, piperacillin–tazobactam alone, and vancomycin plus piperacillin–tazobactam in combination was conducted to understand the impact on acute kidney cell stress and compare the rates of dialysis or death at 9 months among these three drug exposure types. Methods A secondary analysis of the prospective, multicenter Sapphire study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01209169) including 35 intensive care units (ICUs) in North America and Europe was performed. Critically ill adult patients at risk for acute kidney injury (AKI) were included. Urinary [TIMP-2]∙[IGFBP7] was measured serially. Patients who received vancomycin alone, piperacillin–tazobactam alone, or vancomycin plus piperacillin–tazobactam were grouped according to their maximum AKI stage within 3 days of the first drug dose. Results Of 723 critically ill adults admitted to the ICU, 46% received either piperacillin–tazobactam (n = 110), vancomycin (n = 156), or both (n = 67). The urinary [TIMP-2]∙[IGFBP7] was highest on day 1 for the combination group. AKI stage 2/3 occurred more frequently in patients receiving the drug combination than in those receiving piperacillin–tazobactam alone (p = 0.03) but not vancomycin alone (p = 0.29). Risk of death or dialysis at 9 months was greatest for vancomycin plus piperacillin–tazobactam (48%) and similar for patients receiving vancomycin alone (29%) or piperacillin–tazobactam alone (35%) (p = 0.03 for unadjusted and p = 0.048 after adjusting for covariates). Conclusion After exposure to piperacillin–tazobactam and vancomycin in combination, there was a greater release of AKI biomarkers in patients who develop AKI than with piperacillin–tazobactam or vancomycin monotherapy and the combination is associated with possible increased long-term adverse outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandra L. Kane-Gill & Marlies Ostermann & Jing Shi & Emily L. Joyce & John A. Kellum, 2019. "Evaluating Renal Stress Using Pharmacokinetic Urinary Biomarker Data in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Vancomycin and/or Piperacillin–Tazobactam: A Secondary Analysis of the Multicenter Sapphire St," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 42(10), pages 1149-1155, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:42:y:2019:i:10:d:10.1007_s40264-019-00846-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-019-00846-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-019-00846-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-019-00846-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:42:y:2019:i:10:d:10.1007_s40264-019-00846-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.