IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v41y2018i2d10.1007_s40264-017-0596-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Erlotinib Plus Bevacizumab Phase ll Study in Patients with Advanced Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer (JO25567): Updated Safety Results

Author

Listed:
  • Terufumi Kato

    (Kanagawa Cancer Center)

  • Takashi Seto

    (National Kyushu Cancer Center)

  • Makoto Nishio

    (The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research)

  • Koichi Goto

    (National Cancer Center Hospital East)

  • Noboru Yamamoto

    (National Cancer Center Hospital)

  • Isamu Okamoto

    (Kyushu University)

  • Liang Tao

    (Roche (China) Holding Ltd)

  • Wei Yu

    (Genentech Inc.)

  • Tarik Khaznadar

    (F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd)

  • Kosei Tajima

    (Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd)

  • Masahiko Shibata

    (Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd)

  • Akihiro Seki

    (Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd)

  • Nobuyuki Yamamoto

    (Wakayama Medical University)

Abstract

Introduction The phase II JO25567 study compared the efficacy and safety of erlotinib plus bevacizumab vs. erlotinib alone as first-line therapy for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Objective Our objective is to provide updated analyses of safety and the assessment of manageability of specific adverse events. Methods Patients with stage IIIB/IV or recurrent, non-squamous, EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC were randomized to receive erlotinib plus bevacizumab or erlotinib. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Adverse event frequency rates, predictability and manageability, reasons for discontinuation, time to onset, and outcomes of specific adverse events were analyzed. Results The safety analysis population comprised 152 randomized patients (75 erlotinib plus bevacizumab; 77 erlotinib) who received at least one dose of study drug between February 2011 and March 2012. There was no difference in overall incidence of serious adverse events between arms, but more grade 3 or higher adverse events were reported with erlotinib plus bevacizumab (90.7%) than with erlotinib (53.2%), primarily due to grade 3 hypertension. Hypertension was controllable with antihypertensive medications in most cases. Proteinuria and bleeding were also more frequently reported with erlotinib plus bevacizumab than with erlotinib but were manageable and did not lead to early discontinuations. Conclusions The addition of bevacizumab to erlotinib prolonged progression-free survival in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Follow-up safety data were consistent with the known safety profiles of both erlotinib and bevacizumab in NSCLC; this combination appeared to be manageable, and treatment was well tolerated. JapicCTI-111390.

Suggested Citation

  • Terufumi Kato & Takashi Seto & Makoto Nishio & Koichi Goto & Noboru Yamamoto & Isamu Okamoto & Liang Tao & Wei Yu & Tarik Khaznadar & Kosei Tajima & Masahiko Shibata & Akihiro Seki & Nobuyuki Yamamoto, 2018. "Erlotinib Plus Bevacizumab Phase ll Study in Patients with Advanced Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer (JO25567): Updated Safety Results," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 229-237, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:41:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s40264-017-0596-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-017-0596-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-017-0596-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-017-0596-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:41:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s40264-017-0596-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.