IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v41y2018i1d10.1007_s40264-017-0589-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Electronic Healthcare Databases for Post-Marketing Drug Safety Surveillance and Pharmacoepidemiology in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Yang

    (Peking University Health Science Center)

  • Xiaofeng Zhou

    (Pfizer Inc.)

  • Shuangqing Gao

    (Beijing Brainpower Pharmacy Consulting Co. Ltd)

  • Hongbo Lin

    (Center for Disease Control of Yinzhou)

  • Yanming Xie

    (China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences)

  • Yuji Feng

    (Chinese Medical Doctor Association
    Pfizer Investment Co. Ltd.)

  • Kui Huang

    (Pfizer Inc.)

  • Siyan Zhan

    (Peking University Health Science Center)

Abstract

Introduction Electronic healthcare databases (EHDs) are used increasingly for post-marketing drug safety surveillance and pharmacoepidemiology in Europe and North America. However, few studies have examined the potential of these data sources in China. Methods Three major types of EHDs in China (i.e., a regional community-based database, a national claims database, and an electronic medical records [EMR] database) were selected for evaluation. Forty core variables were derived based on the US Mini-Sentinel (MS) Common Data Model (CDM) as well as the data features in China that would be desirable to support drug safety surveillance. An email survey of these core variables and eight general questions as well as follow-up inquiries on additional variables was conducted. These 40 core variables across the three EHDs and all variables in each EHD along with those in the US MS CDM and Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) CDM were compared for availability and labeled based on specific standards. Results All of the EHDs’ custodians confirmed their willingness to share their databases with academic institutions after appropriate approval was obtained. The regional community-based database contained 1.19 million people in 2015 with 85% of core variables. Resampled annually nationwide, the national claims database included 5.4 million people in 2014 with 55% of core variables, and the EMR database included 3 million inpatients from 60 hospitals in 2015 with 80% of core variables. Compared with MS CDM or OMOP CDM, the proportion of variables across the three EHDs available or able to be transformed/derived from the original sources are 24–83% or 45–73%, respectively. Conclusions These EHDs provide potential value to post-marketing drug safety surveillance and pharmacoepidemiology in China. Future research is warranted to assess the quality and completeness of these EHDs or additional data sources in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Yang & Xiaofeng Zhou & Shuangqing Gao & Hongbo Lin & Yanming Xie & Yuji Feng & Kui Huang & Siyan Zhan, 2018. "Evaluation of Electronic Healthcare Databases for Post-Marketing Drug Safety Surveillance and Pharmacoepidemiology in China," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 125-137, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:41:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s40264-017-0589-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-017-0589-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-017-0589-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-017-0589-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:41:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s40264-017-0589-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.