IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v41y2018i12d10.1007_s40264-018-0709-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Switching Patterns in FDA’s Sentinel System: A New Tool to Assess Generic Drugs

Author

Listed:
  • Joshua J. Gagne

    (Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School)

  • Jennifer R. Popovic

    (Harvard Medical School, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute
    RTI International)

  • Michael Nguyen

    (Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration)

  • Sukhminder K. Sandhu

    (Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration)

  • Patty Greene

    (Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration)

  • Rima Izem

    (Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration)

  • Wenlei Jiang

    (Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration)

  • Zhong Wang

    (Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration)

  • Yueqin Zhao

    (Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration)

  • Andrew B. Petrone

    (Harvard Medical School, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute)

  • Anita K. Wagner

    (Harvard Medical School, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute)

  • Sarah K. Dutcher

    (Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration)

Abstract

Introduction Nearly 90% of drugs dispensed in the US are generic products. Objective The aim of this study was to develop and implement a tool for analyzing manufacturer-level drug utilization and switching patterns within the US Food and Drug Administration’s Sentinel system. Methods A descriptive tool was designed to analyze data in the Sentinel common data model and was tested with two case studies—metoprolol extended release (ER) and lamotrigine ER—using claims data from four Sentinel data partners. We plotted initiators of each brand and generic product over time. For metoprolol ER, we evaluated rates of switching from generics around the time of manufacturing issues. For lamotrigine ER, we examined rates of switching back to the brand among those who switched from brand to generic. Results We identified 1,651,285 initiators of metoprolol ER products between July 2008 and September 2015. We observed a large decrease in monthly metoprolol ER initiators (from 25,465 in December 2008 to 13,128 in February 2009), corresponding to recalls by generic manufacturers. We observed simultaneous increases in utilization of the authorized generic and brand products. We identified 4266 initiators of lamotrigine ER with an epilepsy diagnosis between January 2012 and September 2015. Among those who switched from brand to generic, the cumulative incidence of switching back was close to 20% at 2 years. Switchback rates were higher for the first available generic products. Conclusions This developed tool was able to elucidate novel utilization and switching patterns in two case studies. Such information can be used to support surveillance of generic drugs and biosimilars.

Suggested Citation

  • Joshua J. Gagne & Jennifer R. Popovic & Michael Nguyen & Sukhminder K. Sandhu & Patty Greene & Rima Izem & Wenlei Jiang & Zhong Wang & Yueqin Zhao & Andrew B. Petrone & Anita K. Wagner & Sarah K. Dutc, 2018. "Evaluation of Switching Patterns in FDA’s Sentinel System: A New Tool to Assess Generic Drugs," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 41(12), pages 1313-1323, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:41:y:2018:i:12:d:10.1007_s40264-018-0709-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-018-0709-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-018-0709-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-018-0709-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:41:y:2018:i:12:d:10.1007_s40264-018-0709-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.