IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v41y2018i12d10.1007_s40264-018-0706-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Critical Evaluation of Safety Signal Analysis Using Algorithmic Standardised MedDRA Queries

Author

Listed:
  • Carolyn Tieu

    (FDA Fellow in the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) Program
    Office of New Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration)

  • Christopher D. Breder

    (Office of New Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration
    Regulatory Science Program/Advanced Academic Programs, Johns Hopkins University
    Johns Hopkins University
    US Food and Drug Administration)

Abstract

Introduction Algorithmic Standardised MedDRA® Queries (aSMQs) are increasingly used to enhance the efficiency of safety signal detection. The manner that aSMQs affect capture of potential safety cases is unclear. Objectives Our objective was to characterise the performance of aSMQs with respect to their potential for double counting, the likelihood of events in aSMQ positive cases being clinically related, how frequently terms are used for algorithmically positive cases, and the face validity of positive cases based on the drug inducing events. We were also interested in what effect requiring symptoms to overlap temporally would have on performance. Methods We reviewed adverse event (AE) datasets of New Drug Applications and Biological License Applications and compiled a database including preferred terms and corresponding SMQs, SMQ term categories, AE start day, AE duration, drug name, and Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical class. Two reviewers independently determined if the algorithm was met and, if so, whether the broad terms overlapped temporally. Results A total of 107 marketing applications were reviewed, including 103,928 patients and 277,430 AEs. Use of algorithms condensed the number of AEs to between 5 and 8% and the incidence to about 1.5% relative to when the SMQs are used without the algorithm. Certain aSMQs exhibited a potential for overcounting. Requiring symptoms to temporally overlap helped to eliminate irrelevant cases. Conclusions Our findings demonstrate that algorithmic and temporal assessment increased specificity of case retrieval, though the reduction in the number of terms or incidence seemed excessive for certain aSMQs. Evaluating the day of AE onset and duration improve specificity through identification of outlying events. Identification of drug classes known to cause the aSMQ’s clinical condition provides face validity for this tool, yet detection of cases associated with novel classes may provide new understanding of these disorders. Improvements in some of the SMQ term lists may improve the performance of SMQs in general.

Suggested Citation

  • Carolyn Tieu & Christopher D. Breder, 2018. "A Critical Evaluation of Safety Signal Analysis Using Algorithmic Standardised MedDRA Queries," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 41(12), pages 1375-1385, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:41:y:2018:i:12:d:10.1007_s40264-018-0706-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-018-0706-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-018-0706-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-018-0706-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:41:y:2018:i:12:d:10.1007_s40264-018-0706-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.