IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v41y2018i11d10.1007_s40264-018-0684-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Safety of Biologics, Including Biosimilars: Perspectives on Current Status and Future Direction

Author

Listed:
  • Ylenia Ingrasciotta

    (University of Messina)

  • Paola M. Cutroneo

    (A.O.U. Policlinico “G. Martino”
    Sicilian Regional Pharmacovigilance Center)

  • Ilaria Marcianò

    (A.O.U. Policlinico “G. Martino”)

  • Thijs Giezen

    (Foundation Pharmacy for Hospitals in Haarlem)

  • Fabiola Atzeni

    (University of Messina)

  • Gianluca Trifirò

    (University of Messina
    A.O.U. Policlinico “G. Martino”)

Abstract

In recent years, marketing of highly innovative and costly biologics improved the management of high-burden diseases such as autoimmune diseases, cancers, and chronic renal failure. Several widely prescribed biologics have recently lost or will shortly lose their patents, thus opening avenues to the marketing of a growing number of biosimilars worldwide, which are products similar in terms of quality, safety, and efficacy to already licensed reference products, thus allowing for potential savings in pharmaceutical expenditure. Numerous debates about the interchangeability between biosimilars and reference products are still ongoing, owing to concerns about potential immunogenicity raised by switching, which may cause a lack of effect and toxicity. Patients successfully treated with biologic therapy may theoretically receive biosimilars to contain costs, if reference product and related biosimilar are judged as interchangeable. However, the positions of regulatory agencies on the interchangeability and automatic substitution of biologics with biosimilars are very different. The benefit-risk profile of biosimilars has been often questioned by clinicians owing to the limited amount of pre-marketing information on clinical efficacy and safety, despite biosimilarity being based on a comparability exercise with the reference product to gain the biosimilar approval. Nevertheless, after more than 10 years of marketing from the first biosimilar approval in Europe, no proof of differences in terms of the safety profile of biosimilars and originators has been reported. In this context, post-marketing evaluation of both biologics and biosimilars safety profiles through analyses from spontaneous reporting databases and claims databases is crucial. An important issue for the pharmacovigilance of biologics concerns the traceability, indicating the brand name and batch number in spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports, but this requirement is not frequently addressed. This review aims to provide an overview of the characteristics and potential challenges in the safety profile assessment of biologics with a focus on the post-marketing setting.

Suggested Citation

  • Ylenia Ingrasciotta & Paola M. Cutroneo & Ilaria Marcianò & Thijs Giezen & Fabiola Atzeni & Gianluca Trifirò, 2018. "Safety of Biologics, Including Biosimilars: Perspectives on Current Status and Future Direction," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 41(11), pages 1013-1022, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:41:y:2018:i:11:d:10.1007_s40264-018-0684-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-018-0684-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-018-0684-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-018-0684-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kevin Klein & Joep H. G. Scholl & Niels S. Vermeer & André W. Broekmans & Eugène P. Puijenbroek & Marie L. Bruin & Pieter Stolk, 2016. "Traceability of Biologics in The Netherlands: An Analysis of Information-Recording Systems in Clinical Practice and Spontaneous ADR Reports," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 185-192, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stella Stergiopoulos & Carrie A. Brown & Thomas Felix & Gustavo Grampp & Kenneth A. Getz, 2016. "A Survey of Adverse Event Reporting Practices Among US Healthcare Professionals," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 39(11), pages 1117-1127, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:41:y:2018:i:11:d:10.1007_s40264-018-0684-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.