IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v40y2017i7d10.1007_s40264-017-0524-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Safety-Related Regulations on Codeine Use in Children: A Quasi-Experimental Study Using Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database

Author

Listed:
  • Chih-Wan Lin

    (Taiwan Drug Relief Foundation)

  • Ching-Huan Wang

    (Taiwan Drug Relief Foundation)

  • Wei-I Huang

    (Taiwan Drug Relief Foundation)

  • Wei-Ming Ke

    (Taiwan Drug Relief Foundation)

  • Pi-Hui Chao

    (Taiwan Drug Relief Foundation)

  • Wen-Wen Chen

    (Taiwan Drug Relief Foundation)

  • Fei-Yuan Hsiao

    (National Taiwan University
    National Taiwan University
    National Taiwan University Hospital)

Abstract

Introduction Safety concerns regarding potential life-threatening adverse events associated with codeine have resulted in policy decisions to restrict its use in pediatrics. However, whether these drug safety communications have had an immediate and strong impact on codeine use remains in question. Objective We aimed to investigate the impact of the two implemented safety-related regulations (label changes and reimbursement regulations) on the use of codeine for upper respiratory infection (URI) or cough. Methods A quasi-experimental study was performed using Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database. Quarterly data of codeine prescription rates for URI/cough visits were reported, and an interrupted time series design was used to assess the impact of the safety regulations on the uses of codeine among children with URI/cough visits. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to explore patient and provider characteristics associated with the use of codeine. Results The safety-related regulations were associated with a significant reduction in codeine prescription rates of −4.24% (95% confidence interval [CI] −4.78 to −3.70), and the relative reduction compared with predicted rates based on preregulation projections was 60.4, 56.6, and 53.2% in the first, second, and third year after the regulations began, respectively. In the postregulation period, physicians specializing in otolaryngology (odds ratio [OR] 1.47, 95% CI 1.45–1.49), practicing in district hospitals (OR 6.84, 95% CI 5.82–8.04) or clinics (OR 6.50, 95% CI 5.54–7.62), and practicing in the least urbanized areas (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.55–1.64) were more likely to prescribe codeine to children than their counterparts. Conclusions Our study provides a successful example of how to effectively reduce the codeine prescriptions in children in the ‘real-world’ settings, and highlights areas where future effort could be made to improve the safety use of codeine. Future research is warranted to explore whether there was a simultaneous decrease in the incidence rates of codeine-related adverse events following the safety-related regulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Chih-Wan Lin & Ching-Huan Wang & Wei-I Huang & Wei-Ming Ke & Pi-Hui Chao & Wen-Wen Chen & Fei-Yuan Hsiao, 2017. "Impact of Safety-Related Regulations on Codeine Use in Children: A Quasi-Experimental Study Using Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 40(7), pages 615-627, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:40:y:2017:i:7:d:10.1007_s40264-017-0524-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-017-0524-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-017-0524-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-017-0524-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:40:y:2017:i:7:d:10.1007_s40264-017-0524-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.