IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v40y2017i12d10.1007_s40264-017-0575-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Drug-Induced Dental Caries: A Disproportionality Analysis Using Data from VigiBase

Author

Listed:
  • Emilie Patras Campaigno

    (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse)

  • Inès Kebir

    (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse)

  • Jean-Louis Montastruc

    (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse
    Université Paul Sabatier
    Université de Toulouse
    Université et Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse)

  • Manuela Rueter

    (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse)

  • Delphine Maret

    (CNRS, UMR 5288
    Endodontie, Université de Toulouse III
    CHU Toulouse)

  • Maryse Lapeyre-Mestre

    (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse
    Université Paul Sabatier
    Université de Toulouse
    Université et Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse)

  • Brigitte Sallerin

    (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse
    Faculté de Pharmacie de Toulouse)

  • Fabien Despas

    (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse
    Université Paul Sabatier
    Université de Toulouse
    Université et Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse)

Abstract

Introduction Dental caries is defined as a pathological breakdown of the tooth. It is an infectious phenomenon involving a multifactorial aetiology. The impact of drugs on cariogenic risk has been poorly investigated. Objectives In this study, we identified drugs suspected to induce dental caries as adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and then studied a possible pathogenic mechanism for each drug that had a statistically significant disproportionality. Methods We extracted individual case safety reports of dental caries associated with drugs from VigiBase® (the World Health Organization global individual case safety report database). We calculated disproportionality for each drug with a reporting odds ratio (ROR) and 99% confidence interval. We analysed the pharmacodynamics of each drug that had a statistically significant disproportionality. Results In VigiBase®, 5229 safety reports for dental caries concerning 733 drugs were identified. Among these drugs, 88 had a significant ROR, and for 65 of them (73.9%), no information about dental caries was found in the summaries of the product characteristics, the Micromedex® DRUGDEX, or the Martindale databases. Regarding the pharmacological classes of drugs involved in dental caries, we identified bisphosphonates, atropinic drugs, antidepressants, corticoids, immunomodulating drugs, antipsychotics, antiepileptics, opioids and β2-adrenoreceptor agonist drugs. Regarding possible pathogenic mechanisms for these drugs, we identified changes in salivary flow/composition for 54 drugs (61.4%), bone metabolism changes for 31 drugs (35.2%), hyperglycaemia for 32 drugs (36.4%) and/or immunosuppression for 23 drugs (26.1%). For nine drugs (10.2%), the mechanism was unclear. Conclusion We identified 88 drugs with a significant positive disproportionality for dental caries. Special attention has to be paid to bisphosphonates, atropinic drugs, immunosuppressants and drugs causing hyperglycaemia.

Suggested Citation

  • Emilie Patras Campaigno & Inès Kebir & Jean-Louis Montastruc & Manuela Rueter & Delphine Maret & Maryse Lapeyre-Mestre & Brigitte Sallerin & Fabien Despas, 2017. "Drug-Induced Dental Caries: A Disproportionality Analysis Using Data from VigiBase," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 40(12), pages 1249-1258, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:40:y:2017:i:12:d:10.1007_s40264-017-0575-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-017-0575-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-017-0575-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-017-0575-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:40:y:2017:i:12:d:10.1007_s40264-017-0575-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.