IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v40y2017i10d10.1007_s40264-017-0557-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Frequency and Nature of Medication Errors and Adverse Drug Events in Mental Health Hospitals: a Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Ghadah H. Alshehri

    (Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre (MAHSC), University of Manchester)

  • Richard N. Keers

    (Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre (MAHSC), University of Manchester
    Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre (MAHSC), University of Manchester
    Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust)

  • Darren M. Ashcroft

    (Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre (MAHSC), University of Manchester
    Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre (MAHSC), University of Manchester)

Abstract

Introduction Little is known about the frequency and nature of medication errors (MEs) and adverse drug events (ADEs) that occur in mental health hospitals. Objectives This systematic review aims to provide an up-to-date and critical appraisal of the epidemiology and nature of MEs and ADEs in this setting. Method Ten electronic databases were searched, including MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, PsycINFO, Scopus, British Nursing Index, ASSIA, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (1999 to October 2016). Studies that examined the rate of MEs or ADEs in mental health hospitals were included, and quality appraisal of the included studies was conducted. Result In total, 20 studies were identified. The rate of MEs ranged from 10.6 to 17.5 per 1000 patient-days (n = 2) and of ADEs from 10.0 to 42.0 per 1000 patient-days (n = 2) with 13.0–17.3% of ADEs found to be preventable. ADEs were rated as clinically significant (66.0–71.0%), serious (28.0–31.0%), or life threatening (1.4–2.0%). Prescribing errors occurred in 4.5–6.3% of newly written or omitted prescription items (n = 3); dispensing errors occurred in 4.6% of opportunities for error (n = 1) and in 8.8% of patients (n = 1); and medication administration errors occurred in 3.3–48.0% of opportunities for error (n = 5). MEs and ADEs were frequently associated with psychotropics, with atypical antipsychotic drugs commonly involved. Variability in study setting and data collection methods limited direct comparisons between studies. Conclusion Medication errors occur frequently in mental health hospitals and are associated with risk of patient harm. Effective interventions are needed to target these events and improve patient safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghadah H. Alshehri & Richard N. Keers & Darren M. Ashcroft, 2017. "Frequency and Nature of Medication Errors and Adverse Drug Events in Mental Health Hospitals: a Systematic Review," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 40(10), pages 871-886, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:40:y:2017:i:10:d:10.1007_s40264-017-0557-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-017-0557-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-017-0557-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-017-0557-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ghadah H. Alshehri & Darren M. Ashcroft & Joanne Nguyen & Mark Hann & Richard Jones & Kristof Seaton & Graham Newton & Richard N. Keers, 2021. "Prevalence, Nature, Severity and Preventability of Adverse Drug Events in Mental Health Settings: Findings from the MedicAtion relateD harm in mEntal health hospitals (MADE) Study," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 44(8), pages 877-888, August.
    2. Wael Y Khawagi & Douglas T Steinke & Joanne Nguyen & Richard N Keers, 2019. "Identifying potential prescribing safety indicators related to mental health disorders and medications: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-29, May.
    3. Anwar A. Alghamdi & Richard N. Keers & Adam Sutherland & Darren M. Ashcroft, 2019. "Prevalence and Nature of Medication Errors and Preventable Adverse Drug Events in Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care Settings: A Systematic Review," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 42(12), pages 1423-1436, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:40:y:2017:i:10:d:10.1007_s40264-017-0557-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.