IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v39y2016i1d10.1007_s40264-015-0361-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Association Between Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing and Medication-Related Hospital Admissions in Older Patients: A Nested Case Control Study

Author

Listed:
  • C. A. K. Stelt

    (ZANOB, Jeroen Bosch Hospital)

  • A. M. A. Vermeulen Windsant-van den Tweel

    (ZANOB, Jeroen Bosch Hospital)

  • A. C. G. Egberts

    (Utrecht University
    University Medical Center Utrecht)

  • P. M. L. A. Bemt

    (Erasmus Medical Center)

  • A. J. Leendertse

    (University Medical Center Utrecht)

  • W. A. J. J. Hermens

    (ZANOB, Jeroen Bosch Hospital)

  • R. J. Marum

    (Jeroen Bosch Hospital
    VU University Medical Center Amsterdam)

  • H. J. Derijks

    (ZANOB, Jeroen Bosch Hospital
    Utrecht University)

Abstract

Introduction Medication-related problems can cause serious adverse drug events (ADEs) that may lead to hospitalization of the patient. There are multiple screening methods to detect and reduce potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs). Whether this will result in less medication-related hospitalizations is unknown. The study objective was to assess the risk of preventable medication-related hospital admissions associated with potentially inappropriate prescribing, using the Beers 2012 and the Screening Tool of Older Person’s Prescriptions and the Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment (STOPP & START) 2008 criteria. Design, setting and participants A nested case–control study was conducted with a subset of Dutch participants from the Hospital Admissions Related to Medication (HARM) study. Cases were defined as patients aged ≥65 years with a potentially preventable medication-related hospital admission. For each case, one control was selected, matched for age and sex. The primary determinant was the presence of one or more PIMs according to the Beers 2012 and STOPP 2008 criteria. The secondary determinant was the presence of one or more PIMs and PPOs according to the STOPP & START 2008 criteria. The strength of the association between inappropriate prescribing and medication-related hospital admission was evaluated with multivariate logistic regression and expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Results The prevalence of Beers 2012 criteria PIMs in the total cohort was 44.4 %. The prevalence of STOPP & START 2008 criteria PIMs and PPOs were, respectively, 34.1 and 57.7 %. STOPP 2008 criteria PIMs were associated with preventable medication-related hospital admissions [OR adjusted for number of drugs and comorbidities (ORadj) 2.30, 95 % CI 1.30–4.07], whereas there was no association with Beers 2012 criteria PIMs (ORadj 1.49, 95 % CI 0.90–2.47). STOPP PIMs and START PPOs together were also associated with preventable medication-related hospital admissions (ORadj 3.47, 95 % CI 1.70–7.09). Conclusion Our study shows that patients with potentially inappropriate prescribing detected with the STOPP & START 2008 criteria are at risk of preventable medication-related hospital admissions. The STOPP & START 2008 criteria can be used to identify older people at risk of medication-related problems.

Suggested Citation

  • C. A. K. Stelt & A. M. A. Vermeulen Windsant-van den Tweel & A. C. G. Egberts & P. M. L. A. Bemt & A. J. Leendertse & W. A. J. J. Hermens & R. J. Marum & H. J. Derijks, 2016. "The Association Between Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing and Medication-Related Hospital Admissions in Older Patients: A Nested Case Control Study," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 79-87, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:39:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s40264-015-0361-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-015-0361-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-015-0361-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-015-0361-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:39:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s40264-015-0361-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.