IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v35y2012i9d10.1007_bf03261971.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Drug Interactions in Dying Patients

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian Frechen

    (Cologne University Hospital
    Cologne University Hospital)

  • Anna Zoeller

    (Cologne University Hospital)

  • Klaus Ruberg

    (Kronen Pharmacy, Hospital and Community Pharmacy
    Working Group Pharmacists of the German Association of Palliative Care)

  • Raymond Voltz

    (Cologne University Hospital
    Cologne University Hospital
    Cologne Clinical Trials Center)

  • Jan Gaertner

    (Cologne University Hospital
    Cologne University Hospital
    Cologne Clinical Trials Center)

Abstract

Background: Patients at the end of life often receive numerous medications for symptom management. In contrast to all other clinical situations, the aim of pharmacotherapy is strictly focused on quality of life. Objective: The primary aims of this study were to assess the potential for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in patients at the very end of life by identifying drug combinations and risk factors associated with a high risk of DDIs; and evaluate the clinical relevance of the potential DDIs in this unique patient population. Secondary objectives were to increase prescriber awareness and to derive a comprehensive framework for physicians to minimize DDIs in this specific setting of end-of-life care. Materials and Methods: Charts of 364 imminently dying inpatients of two hospices were reviewed retrospectively. Drugs prescribed during the last 2 weeks of life were screened for DDIs by the electronic database of the Federal Union of German Associations of Pharmacists, which classifies DDIs by therapeutic measures required to reduce possible adverse events according to the ORCA system (OpeRational ClAssification of Drug Interactions). Results: Potential DDIs were detected in 223 patients (61%). In a multivariate analysis, polypharmacy was the major predictor for DDIs (odds ratio 1.5, 95% CI 1.4, 1.6). The drugs most commonly involved in therapeutically rel evant potential DDIs were antipsychotics, antiemetics (e.g. metoclopramide, antihistamines), antidepressants, insulin, glucocorticoids, cardiovascular drugs and, in particular, NSAIDs. The most prevalent potential adverse effects were pharmacodynamically additive anticholinergic, antidopaminergic, cardiac (QT interval prolongation) and NSAID-associated toxicity (e.g. gastrointestinal, renal). Conclusion: In the context of end-of-life care, the clinical relevance of DDIs differs from other clinical settings. Most DDIs can be prevented if the prescribing physician considers a few therapeutic principles. Specifically, this concerns the awareness of futile and high-risk medications, as well as rational alternatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Frechen & Anna Zoeller & Klaus Ruberg & Raymond Voltz & Jan Gaertner, 2012. "Drug Interactions in Dying Patients," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 35(9), pages 745-758, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:35:y:2012:i:9:d:10.1007_bf03261971
    DOI: 10.1007/BF03261971
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF03261971
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF03261971?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:35:y:2012:i:9:d:10.1007_bf03261971. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.