IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v24y2001i14d10.2165_00002018-200124140-00006.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adverse Drug Reactions Related to the Use of NSAIDs with a Focus on Nimesulide

Author

Listed:
  • Anita Conforti

    (University of Verona, Policlinico G.B. Rossi)

  • Roberto Leone

    (University of Verona, Policlinico G.B. Rossi)

  • Ugo Moretti

    (University of Verona, Policlinico G.B. Rossi)

  • Federico Mozzo

    (University of Verona, Policlinico G.B. Rossi)

  • Giampaolo Velo

    (University of Verona, Policlinico G.B. Rossi)

Abstract

Objective: To analyse and compare the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with the use of nimesulide with those associated with diclofenac, ketoprofen, and piroxicam, reported spontaneously in a northern Italian area (Veneto and Trentino). Methods: Data were obtained from the spontaneous reporting system database of Veneto-Trentino, the principal contributor to the Italian spontaneous surveillance system. All case reports that occurred in association with all formulations of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) under investigation during the period from January 1988 to December 2000, were analysed in detail. Sales data from June 1996 to May 1999 and prescription data, from 1997 to 2000 from the Veneto region were utilised to select the most widely used NSAIDs to be included in the study. The prescription data were also used to look at the drug use in relation to age. Results: During the study period, 10 608 reports describing 16 571 adverse reactions were entered into the surveillance system. We found 207 case reports for nimesulide, 187 for diclofenac, 174 for ketoprofen, and 137 for piroxicam. Analysis of sales and prescription data revealed that in the Veneto region nimesulide was the most widely prescribed drug followed at a long distance by diclofenac, piroxicam and ketoprofen. No age-related difference in the use of the four drugs was found. Analysis of the case reports revealed significantly different toxicity profiles for the four drugs. In particular, nimesulide was associated with fewer and less severe gastrointestinal (GI) ADRs compared with the other NSAIDs. Nimesulide was associated with about half the number of GI reactions (10.4%) than the other three NSAIDs (21.2% for diclofenac, 21.7% for ketoprofen, 18.6% for piroxicam). Two previously unreported reactions were also found for piroxicam and ketoprofen. Conclusions: Nimesulide is the most frequently used NSAID in Italy. Spontaneous reporting data suggest that nimesulide has the most favourable GI tolerability profile of the NSAIDs investigated, with few reports of severe GI reactions. A few reports of hepatic and renal impairment associated with nimesulide suggest caution in patients at risk. Age-related reporting analysis suggests a higher toxicity for diclofenac and piroxicam in the elderly compared with nimesulide and ketoprofen. This analysis of the Veneto-Trentino database on spontaneous reporting confirms that NSAIDs differ in their tolerability profile, and this fact should be taken into account in the choice of drugs in relation to patient characteristics.

Suggested Citation

  • Anita Conforti & Roberto Leone & Ugo Moretti & Federico Mozzo & Giampaolo Velo, 2001. "Adverse Drug Reactions Related to the Use of NSAIDs with a Focus on Nimesulide," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 24(14), pages 1081-1090, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:24:y:2001:i:14:d:10.2165_00002018-200124140-00006
    DOI: 10.2165/00002018-200124140-00006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.2165/00002018-200124140-00006
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2165/00002018-200124140-00006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:24:y:2001:i:14:d:10.2165_00002018-200124140-00006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.