IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/coopap/v63y2016i3p875-902.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On multiobjective selection for multimodal optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Wessing
  • Mike Preuss

Abstract

Multiobjective selection operators are a popular and straightforward tool for preserving diversity in evolutionary optimization algorithms. One application area where diversity is essential is multimodal optimization with its goal of finding a diverse set of either globally or locally optimal solutions of a single-objective problem. We therefore investigate multiobjective selection methods that identify good quality and diverse solutions from a larger set of candidates. Simultaneously, unary quality indicators from multiobjective optimization also turn out to be useful for multimodal optimization. We focus on experimentally detecting the best selection operators and indicators in two different contexts, namely a one-time subset selection and an iterative application in optimization. Experimental results indicate that certain design decisions generally have advantageous tendencies regarding run time and quality. One such positive example is using a concept of nearest better neighbors instead of the common nearest-neighbor distances. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Wessing & Mike Preuss, 2016. "On multiobjective selection for multimodal optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 875-902, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:coopap:v:63:y:2016:i:3:p:875-902
    DOI: 10.1007/s10589-015-9785-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10589-015-9785-x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10589-015-9785-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:coopap:v:63:y:2016:i:3:p:875-902. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.