IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/compst/v41y2026i1d10.1007_s00180-025-01705-3.html

Individualized treatment effect estimation with compromised adversarial nets

Author

Listed:
  • Atomsa Gemechu Abdisa

    (School of Statistics, East China Normal University, KLATASDS-MOE
    College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Department of Statistics)

  • Yingchun Zhou

    (School of Statistics, East China Normal University, KLATASDS-MOE)

  • Yuqi Qiu

    (School of Statistics, East China Normal University, KLATASDS-MOE)

Abstract

Estimating individualized treatment effects (ITE) in causal inference mainly relies on the assumption of strong ignorability, which is often difficult to validate in practice. Moreover, the true value of ITE is unobservable. These factors make it difficult to obtain an appropriate loss function to estimate the ITE. In this paper, a novel framework that leverages generative adversarial networks (GANs) is proposed to estimate ITE using a bounded loss function under the strong ignorability condition. The bound is obtained based on the supervised loss due to the generator, and the unsupervised loss is due to the discriminator. In the proposed method, the discriminator estimates the conditional density of the estimated unobserved outcome and the conditional density of the observed outcome. The discrepancy between these conditional densities accounts for the unsupervised loss. Furthermore, we developed the Compromised Adversarial Network (ITE-CAN), an advanced ensemble model specifically designed to mitigate common limitations of GANs, such as mode collapse. The theoretical foundation of ITE-CAN is established through a series of theorems that validate its efficacy. Through extensive simulations and empirical analysis on two benchmark datasets, we demonstrate that ITE-CAN consistently outperforms existing methods in terms of estimation accuracy at the individual level. This contribution underscores the significance of our approach in enhancing the precision of individualized treatment effect estimation.

Suggested Citation

  • Atomsa Gemechu Abdisa & Yingchun Zhou & Yuqi Qiu, 2026. "Individualized treatment effect estimation with compromised adversarial nets," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 1-27, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:41:y:2026:i:1:d:10.1007_s00180-025-01705-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s00180-025-01705-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00180-025-01705-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00180-025-01705-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donald B. Rubin, 2005. "Causal Inference Using Potential Outcomes: Design, Modeling, Decisions," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 100, pages 322-331, March.
    2. Stefan Wager & Susan Athey, 2018. "Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 113(523), pages 1228-1242, July.
    3. Lihua Lei & Emmanuel J. Candès, 2021. "Conformal inference of counterfactuals and individual treatment effects," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 83(5), pages 911-938, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Guojun & Song, Ge & Lv, Xiaoxiang & Luo, Shikai & Shi, Chengchun & Zhu, Hongtu, 2023. "DNet: distributional network for distributional individualized treatment effects," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122895, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Mark Kattenberg & Bas Scheer & Jurre Thiel, 2023. "Causal forests with fixed effects for treatment effect heterogeneity in difference-in-differences," CPB Discussion Paper 452, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    3. Joshua B. Gilbert & Zachary Himmelsbach & James Soland & Mridul Joshi & Benjamin W. Domingue, 2024. "Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Item-Level Outcome Data: Insights from Item Response Theory," Papers 2405.00161, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
    4. Pengzhou Wu & Kenji Fukumizu, 2021. "$\beta$-Intact-VAE: Identifying and Estimating Causal Effects under Limited Overlap," Papers 2110.05225, arXiv.org.
    5. Martin Hodula & Milan Szabo & Lukas Pfeifer & Martin Melecky, 2022. "Cooling the Mortgage Loan Market: The Effect of Recommended Borrower-Based Limits on New Mortgage Lending," Working Papers 2022/3, Czech National Bank, Research and Statistics Department.
    6. Zhang, Yingying & Shi, Chengchun & Luo, Shikai, 2023. "Conformal off-policy prediction," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118250, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Dana Turjeman & Fred M. Feinberg, 2024. "When the Data Are Out: Measuring Behavioral Changes Following a Data Breach," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 440-461, March.
    8. Hyung G. Park & Danni Wu & Eva Petkova & Thaddeus Tarpey & R. Todd Ogden, 2023. "Bayesian Index Models for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects on a Binary Outcome," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 15(2), pages 397-418, July.
    9. Joshua B. Gilbert & Zachary Himmelsbach & James Soland & Mridul Joshi & Benjamin W. Domingue, 2025. "Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects with item‐level outcome data: Insights from Item Response Theory," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(4), pages 1417-1449, September.
    10. Mathias Kraus & Stefan Feuerriegel & Maytal Saar-Tsechansky, 2024. "Data-Driven Allocation of Preventive Care with Application to Diabetes Mellitus Type II," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 137-153, January.
    11. Roth, Alexander & Schmidt, Felix, 2023. "Not only a mild winter: German consumers change their behavior to save natural gas," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 7(6), pages 1081-1086.
    12. Shonosuke Sugasawa & Hisashi Noma, 2021. "Efficient screening of predictive biomarkers for individual treatment selection," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(1), pages 249-257, March.
    13. Hodula, Martin & Melecký, Martin & Pfeifer, Lukáš & Szabo, Milan, 2023. "Cooling the mortgage loan market: The effect of borrower-based limits on new mortgage lending," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    14. Yiyan Huang & Cheuk Hang Leung & Siyi Wang & Yijun Li & Qi Wu, 2024. "Unveiling the Potential of Robustness in Selecting Conditional Average Treatment Effect Estimators," Papers 2402.18392, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    15. Kevin Credit & Matthew Lehnert, 2024. "A structured comparison of causal machine learning methods to assess heterogeneous treatment effects in spatial data," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 483-510, October.
    16. Cousineau, Martin & Verter, Vedat & Murphy, Susan A. & Pineau, Joelle, 2023. "Estimating causal effects with optimization-based methods: A review and empirical comparison," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(2), pages 367-380.
    17. Alicia Curth & Mihaela van der Schaar, 2023. "In Search of Insights, Not Magic Bullets: Towards Demystification of the Model Selection Dilemma in Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimation," Papers 2302.02923, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    18. Sokolov, Boris, 2025. "Causal Estimands for Policy Evaluation and Beyond," SocArXiv 4vtpk_v1, Center for Open Science.
    19. Yan Zhang & Zudi Lu, 2024. "A Time Series Synthetic Control Causal Evaluation of the UK’s Mini-Budget Policy on Stock Market," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-25, October.
    20. Hang Miao & Kui Zhao & Zhun Wang & Linbo Jiang & Quanhui Jia & Yanming Fang & Quan Yu, 2020. "Intelligent Credit Limit Management in Consumer Loans Based on Causal Inference," Papers 2007.05188, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:41:y:2026:i:1:d:10.1007_s00180-025-01705-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.