IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/compst/v40y2025i8d10.1007_s00180-025-01636-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters for double poisson regression: a simulation study

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian Appelbaum

    (University of Bamberg
    University of Witten/Herdecke)

  • Thomas Ostermann

    (University of Witten/Herdecke)

  • Uwe Konerding

    (University of Bamberg
    University of Witten/Herdecke)

Abstract

Double Poisson Regression is specifically designed for regression of count variables and allows estimation of the parameters of a regression equation together with a dispersion parameter. Different computational procedures for obtaining maximum likelihood estimates of these parameters are possible. The objective of this contribution is to narrow down which of these computational procedures work best. Four different attributes of the computational procedures are investigated: (1) treatment of the normalisation factor in the Double Poisson with the two specifications: setting this factor equal to 1, and approximating this factor; (2) general estimation strategy with the two specifications: estimating the parameters of the regression equation and the dispersion parameters simultaneously, and estimating them sequentially; (3) starting value for the dispersion parameter with the two specifications: setting this value equal to 1, and computing it from data; and (4) algorithm with three variants of the Newton–Raphson algorithm, two variants of the BHHH algorithm and two variants of the BFGS algorithm as specifications. The four attributes of the computational procedures are investigated using simulation studies. The results of these studies show that the treatment of the normalisation factor very strongly affects parameter estimates and the quality of parameter estimation, whereas the other three attributes have no practically relevant effects. Moreover, the two treatments of the normalisation factor have opposite effects for different evaluation criteria. Therefore, neither treatment can be preferred. In data analyses, both treatments should be applied parallel to each other for sensitivity analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Appelbaum & Thomas Ostermann & Uwe Konerding, 2025. "Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters for double poisson regression: a simulation study," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 40(8), pages 4635-4673, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:40:y:2025:i:8:d:10.1007_s00180-025-01636-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s00180-025-01636-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00180-025-01636-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00180-025-01636-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sebastian Appelbaum & Julia Stronski & Uwe Konerding & Thomas Ostermann, 2025. "The Use of Double Poisson Regression for Count Data in Health and Life Science—A Narrative Review," Stats, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-12, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:40:y:2025:i:8:d:10.1007_s00180-025-01636-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.