IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/compst/v40y2025i8d10.1007_s00180-025-01635-0.html

A powerful penalized multinomial logistic regression approach

Author

Listed:
  • Cornelia Fuetterer

    (Technical University of Munich (TUM))

  • Malte Nalenz

    (Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich)

  • Thomas Augustin

    (Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich)

  • Ruth M. Pfeiffer

    (National Cancer Institute)

Abstract

Penalized regression methods that shrink model coefficients are popular approaches to improve prediction and for variable selection in high-dimensional settings. We present a penalized (or regularized) regression approach for multinomial logistic models for categorical outcomes with a novel adaptive L1-type penalty term, that incorporates weights based on intra- and inter-outcome category distances of each predictor. A predictor that has large between- and small within-outcome category distances is penalized less and has a higher likelihood to be selected for the final model. We propose and study three measures for weight calculation: an analysis of variance (ANOVA)-based measure and two indices used in clustering approaches. Our novel approach, that we term the discriminative power lasso (DP-lasso), thus combines elements of marginal screening with regularized regression methods. We studied the performance of DP-lasso and other published methods in simulations with varying numbers of outcome categories, numbers of predictors, strengths of associations and predictor correlation structures. For correlated predictors, the DP-lasso approach with ANOVA based weights (DPan) resulted in much sparser models than other regularization approaches, especially in high-dimensional settings. When the number p of (correlated) predictors was much larger than the available sample size N, DPan had the highest true positive rate while maintaining low false positive rates for all simulation settings. Similarly, when $${p

Suggested Citation

  • Cornelia Fuetterer & Malte Nalenz & Thomas Augustin & Ruth M. Pfeiffer, 2025. "A powerful penalized multinomial logistic regression approach," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 40(8), pages 4565-4587, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:40:y:2025:i:8:d:10.1007_s00180-025-01635-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s00180-025-01635-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00180-025-01635-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00180-025-01635-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zou, Hui, 2006. "The Adaptive Lasso and Its Oracle Properties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 1418-1429, December.
    2. Friedman, Jerome H. & Hastie, Trevor & Tibshirani, Rob, 2010. "Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 33(i01).
    3. Runze Li & Wei Zhong & Liping Zhu, 2012. "Feature Screening via Distance Correlation Learning," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(499), pages 1129-1139, September.
    4. Alex K. Shalek & Rahul Satija & Joe Shuga & John J. Trombetta & Dave Gennert & Diana Lu & Peilin Chen & Rona S. Gertner & Jellert T. Gaublomme & Nir Yosef & Schraga Schwartz & Brian Fowler & Suzanne W, 2014. "Single-cell RNA-seq reveals dynamic paracrine control of cellular variation," Nature, Nature, vol. 510(7505), pages 363-369, June.
    5. Fan J. & Li R., 2001. "Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 1348-1360, December.
    6. Jianqing Fan & Jinchi Lv, 2008. "Sure independence screening for ultrahigh dimensional feature space," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(5), pages 849-911, November.
    7. Hui Zou & Trevor Hastie, 2005. "Addendum: Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(5), pages 768-768, November.
    8. Hui Zou & Trevor Hastie, 2005. "Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(2), pages 301-320, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Loann David Denis Desboulets, 2018. "A Review on Variable Selection in Regression Analysis," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-27, November.
    2. Wang, Christina Dan & Chen, Zhao & Lian, Yimin & Chen, Min, 2022. "Asset selection based on high frequency Sharpe ratio," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 168-188.
    3. Peter Bühlmann & Jacopo Mandozzi, 2014. "High-dimensional variable screening and bias in subsequent inference, with an empirical comparison," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 407-430, June.
    4. Christidis, Anthony-Alexander & Van Aelst, Stefan & Zamar, Ruben, 2025. "Multi-model subset selection," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    5. Zakariya Yahya Algamal & Muhammad Hisyam Lee, 2019. "A two-stage sparse logistic regression for optimal gene selection in high-dimensional microarray data classification," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 13(3), pages 753-771, September.
    6. Dai, Linlin & Chen, Kani & Sun, Zhihua & Liu, Zhenqiu & Li, Gang, 2018. "Broken adaptive ridge regression and its asymptotic properties," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 334-351.
    7. Liming Wang & Xingxiang Li & Xiaoqing Wang & Peng Lai, 2022. "Unified mean-variance feature screening for ultrahigh-dimensional regression," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 1887-1918, September.
    8. Sheng, Ying & Wang, Qihua, 2020. "Model-free feature screening for ultrahigh dimensional classification," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    9. Zhihua Sun & Yi Liu & Kani Chen & Gang Li, 2022. "Broken adaptive ridge regression for right-censored survival data," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 74(1), pages 69-91, February.
    10. Jingxuan Luo & Lili Yue & Gaorong Li, 2023. "Overview of High-Dimensional Measurement Error Regression Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-22, July.
    11. Firuz Kamalov & Hana Sulieman & Ayman Alzaatreh & Maher Emarly & Hasna Chamlal & Murodbek Safaraliev, 2025. "Mathematical Methods in Feature Selection: A Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-29, March.
    12. Min Chen & Yimin Lian & Zhao Chen & Zhengjun Zhang, 2017. "Sure explained variability and independence screening," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 849-883, October.
    13. Aneiros, Germán & Novo, Silvia & Vieu, Philippe, 2022. "Variable selection in functional regression models: A review," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    14. Li, Xingxiang & Cheng, Guosheng & Wang, Liming & Lai, Peng & Song, Fengli, 2017. "Ultrahigh dimensional feature screening via projection," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 88-104.
    15. Congran Yu & Hengjian Cui, 2025. "Feature screening via false discovery rate control for linear model with multivariate responses," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 66(2), pages 1-29, February.
    16. Xiang-Jie Li & Xue-Jun Ma & Jing-Xiao Zhang, 2017. "Robust feature screening for varying coefficient models via quantile partial correlation," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 80(1), pages 17-49, January.
    17. Li-Pang Chen, 2021. "Feature screening based on distance correlation for ultrahigh-dimensional censored data with covariate measurement error," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 857-884, June.
    18. Tutz, Gerhard & Pößnecker, Wolfgang & Uhlmann, Lorenz, 2015. "Variable selection in general multinomial logit models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 207-222.
    19. Capanu, Marinela & Giurcanu, Mihai & Begg, Colin B. & Gönen, Mithat, 2023. "Subsampling based variable selection for generalized linear models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    20. Zeyu Bian & Erica E. M. Moodie & Susan M. Shortreed & Sahir Bhatnagar, 2023. "Variable selection in regression‐based estimation of dynamic treatment regimes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 988-999, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:40:y:2025:i:8:d:10.1007_s00180-025-01635-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.