IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/compst/v40y2025i7d10.1007_s00180-025-01615-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bayesian nonparametric hypothesis testing methods on multiple comparisons

Author

Listed:
  • Qiuchen Hai

    (The University of Texas at San Antonio)

  • Zhuanzhuan Ma

    (The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley)

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce Bayesian testing procedures based on the Bayes factor to compare the means across multiple populations in classical nonparametric contexts. The proposed Bayesian methods are designed to maximize the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when the Bayes factor exceeds a specified evidence threshold. It is shown that these procedures have straightforward closed-form expressions based on classical nonparametric test statistics and their corresponding critical values, allowing for easy computation. We also demonstrate that they effectively control Type I error and enable researchers to make consistent decisions aligned with both frequentist and Bayesian approaches, provided that the evidence threshold for the Bayesian methods is set according to the significance level of the frequentist tests. Importantly, the proposed approaches allow for the quantification of evidence from empirical data in favor of the null hypothesis, an advantage that frequentist methods lack, as they cannot quantify support for the null when the null hypothesis is not rejected. We also present simulation studies and real-world applications to illustrate the performance of the proposed testing procedures.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiuchen Hai & Zhuanzhuan Ma, 2025. "Bayesian nonparametric hypothesis testing methods on multiple comparisons," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 40(7), pages 3867-3882, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:40:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s00180-025-01615-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s00180-025-01615-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00180-025-01615-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00180-025-01615-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:40:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s00180-025-01615-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.