IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/compst/v40y2025i7d10.1007_s00180-025-01602-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On practical implementation of the fully robust one-sided cross-validation method in the nonparametric regression and density estimation contexts

Author

Listed:
  • Olga Savchuk

    (University of South Florida)

Abstract

The fully robust one-sided cross-validation (OSCV) method has versions in the nonparametric regression and density estimation settings. It selects the consistent bandwidths for estimating the continuous regression and density functions that might have finitely many discontinuities in their first derivatives. The theoretical results underlying the method were thoroughly elaborated in the preceding publications, while its practical implementations needed improvement. In particular, until this publication, no appropriate implementation of the method existed in the density estimation context. In the regression setting, the previously proposed implementation has a serious disadvantage of occasionally producing the irregular OSCV functions that complicates the bandwidth selection procedure. In this article, we make a substantial progress towards resolving the aforementioned issues by proposing a suitable implementation of fully robust OSCV for density estimation and providing specific recommendations for the further improvement of the method in the regression setting.

Suggested Citation

  • Olga Savchuk, 2025. "On practical implementation of the fully robust one-sided cross-validation method in the nonparametric regression and density estimation contexts," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 40(7), pages 3715-3743, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:40:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s00180-025-01602-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s00180-025-01602-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00180-025-01602-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00180-025-01602-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:40:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s00180-025-01602-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.