IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/comaot/v27y2021i3d10.1007_s10588-021-09328-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deceptive accusations and concealed identities as misinformation campaign strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Daniele Bellutta

    (Carnegie Mellon University)

  • Catherine King

    (Carnegie Mellon University)

  • Kathleen M. Carley

    (Carnegie Mellon University)

Abstract

This paper presents a new social media phenomenon that sees users lying about their deceptive motivations by either dishonestly claiming that they are not bots or by asserting that real news is actually fake news. We analyzed the use of the #FakeNews and #NotABot hashtags in Twitter data collected on the 2019 Canadian federal elections. Our findings show that the #FakeNews hashtag was most likely to be connected to an established news source rather than an actual fake news site and that users of the #NotABot hashtag were no more likely to be human than other users in our data set. This phenomenon of lying about lying has been used to discredit well-known news organizations and amplify political misinformation, showing how online influence campaigns continue to evolve to manipulate social media users even as people have become more aware of the dangers of online misinformation.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniele Bellutta & Catherine King & Kathleen M. Carley, 2021. "Deceptive accusations and concealed identities as misinformation campaign strategies," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 302-323, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:comaot:v:27:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s10588-021-09328-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10588-021-09328-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10588-021-09328-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10588-021-09328-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:comaot:v:27:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s10588-021-09328-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.