IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/climat/v178y2025i7d10.1007_s10584-025-03970-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scientific uptake in United Nations Security Council debates on climate change and security

Author

Listed:
  • Nina Uexkull

    (University of Konstanz
    Uppsala University)

  • Halvard Buhaug

    (Peace Research Institute Oslo
    Norwegian University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

Concerns about adverse security implications of climate change have fostered a booming research agenda and have also gained increasing traction in international political fora, such as the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). To what extent do policy discourses and decisions reflect the scientific understanding of the problem? Here, we assess evidence on uptake of scientific research on climate change and violent conflict in high-level UNSC debates, 2007–2022. We show that UNSC member states increasingly acknowledge climate-conflict risks as real but context-dependent, consistent with recent academic literature on the topic. Even so, views remain divided among prominent Council members, blocking progress on this matter. Explicit engagement with science on climate change and conflict, which might have helped resolve disagreements, remains rare and partly selective. We highlight challenges and opportunities for the scientific community to improve the perceived relevance and accessibility of research to stakeholders and strengthen science-policy interaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Nina Uexkull & Halvard Buhaug, 2025. "Scientific uptake in United Nations Security Council debates on climate change and security," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 178(7), pages 1-15, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:178:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s10584-025-03970-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10584-025-03970-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-025-03970-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10584-025-03970-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:178:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s10584-025-03970-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.