IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/climat/v132y2015i1p111-125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What can ecosystem models tell us about the risk of eutrophication in the North Sea?

Author

Listed:
  • S. Saux Picart
  • J. Allen
  • M. Butenschön
  • Y. Artioli
  • L. Mora
  • S. Wakelin
  • J. Holt

Abstract

Eutrophication is a process resulting from an increase in anthropogenic nutrient inputs from rivers and other sources, the consequences of which can include enhanced algal biomass, changes in plankton community composition and oxygen depletion near the seabed. Within the context of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, indicators (and associated threshold) have been identified to assess the eutrophication status of an ecosystem. Large databases of observations (in situ) are required to properly assess the eutrophication status. Marine hydrodynamic/ecosystem models provide continuous fields of a wide range of ecosystem characteristics. Using such models in this context could help to overcome the lack of in situ data, and provide a powerful tool for ecosystem-based management and policy makers. Here we demonstrate a methodology that uses a combination of model outputs and in situ data to assess the risk of eutrophication in the coastal domain of the North Sea. The risk of eutrophication is computed for the past and present time as well as for different future scenarios. This allows us to assess both the current risk and its sensitivity to anthropogenic pressure and climate change. Model sensitivity studies suggest that the coastal waters of the North Sea may be more sensitive to anthropogenic rivers loads than climate change in the near future (to 2040). Copyright The Author(s) 2015

Suggested Citation

  • S. Saux Picart & J. Allen & M. Butenschön & Y. Artioli & L. Mora & S. Wakelin & J. Holt, 2015. "What can ecosystem models tell us about the risk of eutrophication in the North Sea?," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 132(1), pages 111-125, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:132:y:2015:i:1:p:111-125
    DOI: 10.1007/s10584-014-1071-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10584-014-1071-x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10584-014-1071-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Wesselink & Andrew Challinor & James Watson & Keith Beven & Icarus Allen & Helen Hanlon & Ana Lopez & Susanne Lorenz & Friederike Otto & Andy Morse & Cameron Rye & Stephane Saux-Picard & David St, 2015. "Equipped to deal with uncertainty in climate and impacts predictions: lessons from internal peer review," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 132(1), pages 1-14, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:132:y:2015:i:1:p:111-125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.