Quantification of the influence of snow course measurement date on climatic trends
The Natural Resources Conservation Service measures high elevation snowpack manually at snow courses across the western US. In addition to supporting the production of seasonal snowmelt-driven streamflow forecasts, this long-term dataset is widely used throughout the research community to study historical climatic change impacts. Therefore it is critical to understand what factors may affect the quality of the measurements, especially if those non-climatic factors possess long-term trends. For example, the snowpack measurement dates are nominally the first and fifteenth of the month although they actually average approximately 2 days earlier. This study found that the variability of measurement dates are determined by, 1) the epoch of the measurement, 2) the day of the week of the nominal measurement date, 3) the presence or absence of snow at the site and 4) if the measurement is for the first or the fifteenth of the month. The measurement date is less variable if snow is absent from the site. Mid-month data are collected closer to the nominal measurement date, and first of month data have a greater early bias. Since 1957, there has been a stronger aversion to collecting data on Fridays and weekends. Measurements are taken today on average 1.35 days earlier than they were before 1957. The effect on measurement bias depended on the time of year and was generally less than 5 % of the measurement. Therefore, changes in measurement date only slightly mask one’s ability to accurately detect long-term climatic trends. Copyright U.S. Government 2012
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 114 (2012)
Issue (Month): 3 (October)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.springer.com|
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10584|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:114:y:2012:i:3:p:549-565. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla)or (Rebekah McClure)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.