Author
Listed:
- Williams Chibueze Munonye
(Linkoping University)
Abstract
The transition to a Circular Economy (CE) represents a critical rethinking of production and consumption systems, aiming to replace the prevailing linear model with regenerative cycles that prioritize resource efficiency, waste reduction, and environmental sustainability. However, existing performance indicators such as Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and conventional efficiency metrics are insufficient for capturing the complex interactions among resource flows, lifecycle impacts, and social equity core dimensions of circularity. This review examines the emergence and application of Circular Economy Metrics (CEMs) as tools for advancing measurement and strategic implementation across micro, meso, and macro levels. Through a systematic synthesis of the literature, the study evaluates key methodologies including Material Flow Analysis (MFA) and Life Cycle Analysis (LCA), alongside integrative frameworks such as the Circularity Index (CI) and the Circular-Based Quantity Assessment Tool (C.Q.A.T.). These tools are assessed for their effectiveness in operationalizing circularity, guiding sustainable business practices, and informing policy. Despite their promise, several barriers constrain the adoption of CEMs, including data limitations, technological challenges, lack of standardization, and fragmented regulatory environments. The review identifies best practices and highlights critical gaps, particularly regarding the integration of social and long-term economic dimensions. Through mapping current approaches and their limitations, this article contributes to the development of more holistic and actionable CE metrics. It offers a foundation for future research and policy innovation aimed at supporting systemic transitions to a robust and inclusive circular economy.
Suggested Citation
Williams Chibueze Munonye, 2025.
"Towards Circular Economy Metrics: a Systematic Review,"
Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(5), pages 4093-4135, October.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:circec:v:5:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s43615-025-00604-5
DOI: 10.1007/s43615-025-00604-5
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:circec:v:5:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s43615-025-00604-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.