IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aphecp/v23y2025i6d10.1007_s40258-025-00984-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health Technology Assessment and Environmental Impact: A Scoping Review of State of Art and Future Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Ippazio Cosimo Antonazzo

    (University of Milan-Bicocca
    Auxologico Research Hospital-IRCCS)

  • Giorgia Gribaudo

    (University of Milan-Bicocca
    University of Bologna)

  • Lisa Ye

    (University of Milan-Bicocca)

  • Pietro Ferrara

    (University of Milan-Bicocca
    Auxologico Research Hospital-IRCCS)

  • Lorenzo Losa

    (University of Milan-Bicocca)

  • Paolo Abrate

    (Struttura Semplice Continuità Farmaceutica Ospedale-Territorio ASL TO4)

  • Fabio Iraldo

    (Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna)

  • Lorenzo Giovanni Mantovani

    (University of Milan-Bicocca
    Auxologico Research Hospital-IRCCS)

  • Paolo Angelo Cortesi

    (University of Milan-Bicocca
    Auxologico Research Hospital-IRCCS)

Abstract

Introduction Manufacture, distribution, use, excretion, and disposal of health technologies all have environmental impacts (EIs). In the health technology assessment (HTA) definition, EI is recognized as a domain that should be assessed. However, EIs in HTA methods are lacking. The aim of this scoping review was to identify current advances and limitations in incorporating EI in HTA evaluation. Methods We searched two databases, PubMed and Embase (01/01/2019–20/10/2023, updated on 15/05/2025), using the following keywords: “HTA” and “environmental impact.” Articles published in English were included. Additionally, no filters by study design or type of evaluated technology were used. Results In total, 264 studies were screened after duplicates had been removed. Among them, 15 articles were included. Identified publications highlighted the necessity of robust and clear methods of EI assessment and its inclusion in the HTA process. Several authors have outlined the importance of assessing the EI of health technology throughout its life cycle, including raw materials, manufacturing, use, and disposal. However, the EI assessment in HTA presents significant challenges, such as determining a clear domain of EI, the perspective, and the time horizon for the assessment. EI assessment challenges also include the lack of disaggregated data on pollutant emissions and natural resource consumption, as well as recommendations on the use of the EI data by decision makers and HTA agencies. In the literature, different methods and approaches have been proposed to incorporate EI in HTA; some rely on already establish assessment methods (“enriched” cost-utility analysis, adjusted willingness to pay, and multicriteria decision analysis) and others proposed more specific approaches, such as “information conduit,” “parallel evaluation,” “integrated evaluation,” and “environment-focused evaluation.” Conclusion HTA framework needs adjustments to incorporate environmental information, including environmental healthcare technology impact. Clear and robust methods on EI assessment and inclusion in the HTA process should be provided by HTA agencies and international societies. Further, manufacturers should improve the data generation on the EI of their products, with new studies able to generate individual-level data on environmental technology impact.

Suggested Citation

  • Ippazio Cosimo Antonazzo & Giorgia Gribaudo & Lisa Ye & Pietro Ferrara & Lorenzo Losa & Paolo Abrate & Fabio Iraldo & Lorenzo Giovanni Mantovani & Paolo Angelo Cortesi, 2025. "Health Technology Assessment and Environmental Impact: A Scoping Review of State of Art and Future Perspective," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 1027-1038, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:23:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s40258-025-00984-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s40258-025-00984-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40258-025-00984-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40258-025-00984-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:23:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s40258-025-00984-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.