IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aphecp/v23y2025i4d10.1007_s40258-025-00951-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Horizons? Assessing General Public Preferences for a Wellbeing Economy in the Post-COVID-19 World

Author

Listed:
  • Rachel Milte

    (Flinders University, Adelaide)

  • Matthew Crocker

    (Flinders University, Adelaide)

  • Gang Chen

    (Centre for Health Economics, Monash University)

  • Gordon Duff

    (Public Service Research Group, UNSW Canberra)

  • Julie Ratcliffe

    (Flinders University, Adelaide)

Abstract

Objective As societies emerge from the COVID-19 pandemic, governments are increasingly moving away from a focus on economic growth at any cost towards the principles of a wellbeing economy, focused on achieving a more equitable distribution of wealth and wellbeing. This study aimed to assess the relative importance to the Australian general public of the key principles of a wellbeing economy and to investigate heterogeneity in preferences between demographic subgroups. Methods An online survey was developed and delivered to a general public sample of 2042 Australian adults (aged 18 years and above). Respondents were invited to rank the key principles of a wellbeing economy (dignity, nature and climate, social connection, fairness and participation) plus two additional traditional economic indicators of societal success (‘economic growth’ and ‘economic prosperity’) in order of their relative importance for informing future policy directions. Data analysis was conducted using simple summative scoring, which involved the use of a point system allocated to rankings as a dependent variable. In addition, a rank-ordered logit model was used to explore preferences for the entire sample and subgroups defined by key socio-demographic characteristics. Results ‘Dignity’ (people have enough to live in comfort, safety and happiness) and ‘fairness’ (equal opportunity for all Australians and the gap between richest and poorest greatly reduced) were ranked as the most important priorities for the total sample and for key socio-demographic subgroups differentiated by age, level of education and level of socio-economic advantage. Traditional economic indicators of societal success including ‘economic prosperity’ and ‘economic growth’ were considered important but generally ranked below the principles of ‘dignity’ and ‘fairness’. Conclusions The findings indicate that government movements away from traditional economic indicators and towards new broader wellbeing economy measures of societal success are likely to be supported by the general public.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachel Milte & Matthew Crocker & Gang Chen & Gordon Duff & Julie Ratcliffe, 2025. "New Horizons? Assessing General Public Preferences for a Wellbeing Economy in the Post-COVID-19 World," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 679-691, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:23:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s40258-025-00951-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s40258-025-00951-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40258-025-00951-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40258-025-00951-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:23:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s40258-025-00951-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.