IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aphecp/v17y2019i6d10.1007_s40258-019-00497-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Adherence-Contingent Rebates on Chronic Disease Treatment Costs to Promote Medication Adherence: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Marcel Bilger

    (Health Economics and Policy, Vienna University of Business and Economics
    Duke-NUS Medical School)

  • Tina T. Wong

    (Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore Eye Research Institute)

  • Jia Yi Lee

    (Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore Eye Research Institute)

  • Kaye L. Howard

    (Duke-NUS Medical School)

  • Filipinas G. Bundoc

    (Duke-NUS Medical School)

  • Ecosse L. Lamoureux

    (Duke-NUS Medical School
    Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore Eye Research Institute)

  • Eric A. Finkelstein

    (Duke-NUS Medical School
    Duke University)

Abstract

Background Poor adherence to medications is a global public health concern with substantial health and cost implications, especially for chronic conditions. In the USA, poor adherence is estimated to cause 125,000 deaths and cost $US100 billion annually. The most successful adherence-promoting strategies that have been identified so far have moderate effect, are relatively costly, and raise availability, feasibility, and/or scalability issues. Objective The main objective of SIGMA (Study on Incentives for Glaucoma Medication Adherence) was to measure the effectiveness on medication adherence of a novel incentive strategy based on behavioral economics that we refer to as adherence-contingent rebates. These rebates offered patients a near-term benefit while leveraging loss aversion and regret and increasing the salience of adherence. Methods SIGMA is a 6-month randomized, controlled, open-label, single-center superiority trial with two parallel arms. A total of 100 non-adherent glaucoma patients from the Singapore National Eye Centre were randomized into intervention (adherence-contingent rebates) and usual care (no rebates) arms in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was the mean change from baseline in percentage of adherent days at Month 6. The trial registration number is NCT02271269 and a detailed study protocol has been published elsewhere. Findings We found that participants who were offered adherence-contingent rebates were adherent to all their medications on 73.1% of the days after 6 months, which is 12.2 percentage points (p = 0.027) higher than in those not receiving the rebates after controlling for baseline differences. This better behavioral outcome was achieved by rebates averaging 8.07 Singapore dollars ($US5.94 as of 2 November 2017) per month during the intervention period. Conclusion This study shows that simultaneously leveraging several insights from behavioral economics can significantly improve medication adherence rates. The relatively low cost of the rebates and significant health and cost implications of medication non-adherence suggest that this strategy has the potential to cost-effectively improve health outcomes for many conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcel Bilger & Tina T. Wong & Jia Yi Lee & Kaye L. Howard & Filipinas G. Bundoc & Ecosse L. Lamoureux & Eric A. Finkelstein, 2019. "Using Adherence-Contingent Rebates on Chronic Disease Treatment Costs to Promote Medication Adherence: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 841-855, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:17:y:2019:i:6:d:10.1007_s40258-019-00497-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s40258-019-00497-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40258-019-00497-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40258-019-00497-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dalia Littman & Scott E. Sherman & Andrea B. Troxel & Elizabeth R. Stevens, 2022. "Behavioral Economics and Tobacco Control: Current Practices and Future Opportunities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-10, July.
    2. Marcel Bilger & Mitesh Shah & Ngiap Chuan Tan & Cynthia Y. L. Tan & Filipinas G. Bundoc & Joann Bairavi & Eric A. Finkelstein, 2021. "Process- and Outcome-Based Financial Incentives to Improve Self-Management and Glycemic Control in People with Type 2 Diabetes in Singapore: A Randomized Controlled Trial," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 14(5), pages 555-567, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:17:y:2019:i:6:d:10.1007_s40258-019-00497-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.