IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aphecp/v15y2017i2d10.1007_s40258-016-0277-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Virtual Touch™ Quantification to Diagnose and Monitor Liver Fibrosis in Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer A. Summers

    (King’s Technology Evaluation Centre
    King’s College London)

  • Muralikrishnan Radhakrishnan

    (King’s Technology Evaluation Centre
    The David Goldberg Centre)

  • Elizabeth Morris

    (King’s Technology Evaluation Centre
    St Thomas’ Hospital)

  • Anastasia Chalkidou

    (King’s Technology Evaluation Centre
    St Thomas’ Hospital)

  • Tiago Rua

    (St Thomas’ Hospital)

  • Anita Patel

    (Queen Mary University of London)

  • Viktoria McMillan

    (King’s Technology Evaluation Centre
    St Thomas’ Hospital)

  • Abdel Douiri

    (King’s College London)

  • Yanzhong Wang

    (King’s College London)

  • Salma Ayis

    (King’s College London)

  • Joanne Higgins

    (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence)

  • Stephen Keevil

    (King’s Technology Evaluation Centre
    St Thomas’ Hospital
    St Thomas’ Hospital)

  • Cornelius Lewis

    (King’s Technology Evaluation Centre
    King’s College Hospital)

  • Janet Peacock

    (King’s Technology Evaluation Centre
    King’s College London
    NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London)

Abstract

Virtual Touch™ Quantification (VTq) is a software application used with Siemens Acuson ultrasound scanners to assess the stiffness of liver tissue. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Medical Technologies Advisory Committee (MTAC) selected VTq for evaluation and invited the company to submit clinical and economic evidence. King’s Technology Evaluation Centre, an External Assessment Centre (EAC) commissioned by NICE, independently assessed the evidence submitted. The EAC conducted its own systematic review, meta-analysis and economic analysis to supplement the company’s submitted evidence. The meta-analyses comparing VTq and transient elastography (TE) with liver biopsy (LB) provided pooled estimates of liver stiffness and stage of fibrosis for the study populations (hepatitis B, hepatitis C or combined populations). When comparing significant fibrosis (Metavir score F ≥ 2) for both hepatitis B and C, VTq had slightly higher values for both sensitivity and specificity (77 and 81 %) than TE (76 and 71 %). The overall prevalence of cirrhosis (F4, combined populations) was similar with VTq and TE (23 vs. 23 %), and significant fibrosis (F ≥ 2) was lower for VTq than for TE (55 vs. 62 %). The EAC revised the company’s de novo cost model, which resulted in a cost saving of £53 (against TE) and £434 (against LB). Following public consultation, taking into account submitted comments, NICE Medical Technology Guidance MTG27 was published in September 2015. This recommended the adoption of the VTq software to diagnose and monitor liver fibrosis in patients with hepatitis B or hepatitis C.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer A. Summers & Muralikrishnan Radhakrishnan & Elizabeth Morris & Anastasia Chalkidou & Tiago Rua & Anita Patel & Viktoria McMillan & Abdel Douiri & Yanzhong Wang & Salma Ayis & Joanne Higgins &, 2017. "Virtual Touch™ Quantification to Diagnose and Monitor Liver Fibrosis in Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 139-154, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:15:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s40258-016-0277-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s40258-016-0277-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40258-016-0277-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40258-016-0277-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:15:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s40258-016-0277-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.