IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/anresc/v75y2026i1d10.1007_s00168-025-01424-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EU funds and TFP growth: how the impact changed over time and space

Author

Listed:
  • Federico Aresu

    (University of Cagliari
    CRENoS)

  • Emanuela Marrocu

    (University of Cagliari
    CRENoS)

  • Raffaele Paci

    (University of Cagliari
    CRENoS)

Abstract

The European Union’s (EU) Cohesion Policy aims to reduce regional disparities through the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIFs). While previous research has documented the positive effects of ESIFs on GDP growth, the role of regional capital accumulation in the growth process remains underexplored. To address this gap, the present study investigates the impact of ESIFs on regional performance by focusing on total factor productivity (TFP) growth as the outcome variable. TFP is computed by accounting for the highly heterogeneous patterns of capital accumulation across 262 NUTS2 regions over the period 2000–2019. Using annualised regional expenditure data, we assess the influence of fund allocation independently of EU programming periods. Our empirical strategy accounts for temporal heterogeneity by distinguishing three distinct phases: pre-crisis (2000–2008), crisis (2008–2014) and recovery (2014–2019). It also considers spatial heterogeneity by classifying regions according to their level of economic development. Furthermore, we disentangle the effects of the main funds—namely, the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the European Social Fund (ESF), the Cohesion Fund (CF), and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD). The results indicate that ERDF is positively associated with regional TFP, particularly during the 2014–2019 period, contributing to the reduction of productivity gaps between Eastern and more advanced regions. EAFRD enhances agricultural TFP growth, although primarily in regions that already exhibit high productivity levels. The remaining funds do not show statistically significant effects. These findings underline the importance of accounting for investment heterogeneity when evaluating the effectiveness of ESIFs and contribute to the broader policy debate on regional development strategies within the EU.

Suggested Citation

  • Federico Aresu & Emanuela Marrocu & Raffaele Paci, 2026. "EU funds and TFP growth: how the impact changed over time and space," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 75(1), pages 1-35, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:anresc:v:75:y:2026:i:1:d:10.1007_s00168-025-01424-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s00168-025-01424-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00168-025-01424-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00168-025-01424-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • O47 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth; Aggregate Productivity; Cross-Country Output Convergence
    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes
    • R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:anresc:v:75:y:2026:i:1:d:10.1007_s00168-025-01424-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.