Constrained game approaches to the systematic regulation of land use variability
This paper develops an intertemporal goal programming approach to the modelling of policy induced variations in production methods and types and quantities of resources under conditions of regulation and weather related risk and market related risk and uncertainty. The goal programming approach is contrasted with the Howitt's calibration approach and with the data envelopment approach of Thompson and others. Howitt's method assumes persistence of production techniques and cost parameters even though an explicit purpose of regulatory policy may be to change them. And standard data envelopment analysis does not explicitly consider production costs or market prices or regulatory policies at all.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 36 (2002)
Issue (Month): 3 ()
|Note:||Received: June 1999/Accepted: November 2001|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00168/index.htm|
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:||Web: http://link.springer.de/orders.htm|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:anresc:v:36:y:2002:i:3:p:497-517. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Guenther Eichhorn)or (Christopher F Baum)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.