IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v94y2000i1p11-3510.1023-a1018969117043.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An empirical bioeconomic investigation of efficiency in the insecticide regulatory process

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Kazmierczak

Abstract

This paper presents an interdisciplinary approach to estimating the relative efficiency of static, myopic, and dynamic insecticide regulatory decision making when there are potential impacts associated with pest resistance. A theoretical control model was developed using expected total economic surplus as the objective function, with an empirical solution to the maximization problem attained by imposing a heuristic search procedure on a bioeconomic simulation model. Although the impact of non‐dynamic decision making was the most severe, in percentage terms, for short‐run planning horizons, the magnitude of the long‐run losses associated with non‐dynamic decision making could serve as a rationale for modifying the regulatory process to include dynamic considerations. The static analyses usually used in the benefits assessment procedure may severely underestimate the actual benefits of continued chemical registration, and the efficiency gains to society have the potential to offset the increased costs of regulation that would occur under a revised process. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Kazmierczak, 2000. "An empirical bioeconomic investigation of efficiency in the insecticide regulatory process," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 11-35, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:94:y:2000:i:1:p:11-35:10.1023/a:1018969117043
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1018969117043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1018969117043
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1018969117043?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:94:y:2000:i:1:p:11-35:10.1023/a:1018969117043. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.