Author
Listed:
- Ruicheng Yang
(Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics)
- Pucong Wang
(Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics)
- Li Li
(Marist College)
- Sheng Yong
(Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics)
Abstract
This paper investigates feature selection and parameter optimization of machine learning models to enhance classification and prediction performance, with specific focus on the CatBoost model within the realm of corporate credit rating. We propose a novel hybrid model called SSA-CatBoost, which employs the Sparrow Search Algorithm (SSA) to optimize parameters, significantly improving the prediction accuracy of CatBoost. Moreover, to address the inherent black box nature of machine learning models, the paper utilizes the SHAP tool to explicate how the model determines corporate credit ratings based on diverse features. Based upon the data extracted from the annual financial reports of Chinese corporates from 2017 to May 2024, the empirical findings uncover several key insights: (a) The SSA-CatBoost model achieves superior evaluation metrics, with an accuracy of 0.9911, precision of 0.9983, recall of 0.9983, F1-score of 0.9933, and AUC value of 0.9943, surpassing other models such as CatBoost, RF, LightGBM, XGBoost, SVM, and LSTM, as well as their respective SSA-optimized versions. (b) SSA can effectively search for the optimal parameters of machine learning models, thereby improving their predictive performance; (c) The necessity of parameter optimization for the CatBoost model is explained; (d) The SHAP method is employed to demonstrate a positive correlation between corporate credit rating and SHAP value, that is, the higher the SHAP value of a corporation, the greater the likelihood that it will be classified as a high credit-rated corporation by the machine learning model.
Suggested Citation
Ruicheng Yang & Pucong Wang & Li Li & Sheng Yong, 2025.
"An explainable SSA-CatBoost machine learning model and application in corporate credit rating: evidence from China,"
Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 354(1), pages 273-307, November.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:annopr:v:354:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-025-06513-y
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-025-06513-y
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:354:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-025-06513-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.