IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v353y2025i3d10.1007_s10479-025-06828-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate social responsibility, profitability and marketability in business performance evaluation: a directional network slacks-based measure approach

Author

Listed:
  • Shih-Heng Yu

    (National United University)

  • Ming Chen

    (Fudan University
    Nanjing University of Finance and Economics)

  • Fu-Chiang Yang

    (National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

In order to realize corporate sustainability, it is crucial for firms to embed environmental, social and governance (ESG) concerns into their business practices when embracing corporate social responsibility (CSR). The evaluation of business performance thus far provides limited support for the promotion of corporate sustainability since it rarely takes the nonfinancial information of ESG into account. Although much research has been carried out on the association between CSR and business performance, little attention has been given to incorporating CSR within the production system from an efficiency perspective. Using the well-known two-stage (profitability–marketability) data envelopment analysis (DEA) as a backdrop, this paper presents an extended framework that incorporates CSR, profitability and marketability into a parallel-series (mixed) structure of network DEA. A directional network slacks-based measure model, which allows the presence of shared resources and nonpositive data, is formulated to better evaluate firms’ business performance. The proposed model is illustrated with an empirical application to overall and three divisional efficiencies of 71 firms that were awarded Top 100 Excellence in CSR in Taiwan. The empirical results indicate that most sampled firms do not achieve full efficiency, highlighting considerable room for improvement. Among the dimensions of profitability, CSR, and marketability, CSR efficiency is relatively the lowest, yet it shows a strong positive association with overall efficiency, underscoring its crucial role in promoting sustainable business operations. In contrast, a negative relationship between profitability and CSR efficiencies suggests potential trade-offs between financial performance and social responsibility. The proposed network DEA framework enables firms to assess their competitiveness across these dimensions and set appropriate improvement targets, thereby supporting more sustainable business practices. These findings also provide valuable insights for investors seeking to make informed, ESG-oriented investment decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Shih-Heng Yu & Ming Chen & Fu-Chiang Yang, 2025. "Corporate social responsibility, profitability and marketability in business performance evaluation: a directional network slacks-based measure approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 353(3), pages 1211-1237, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:353:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10479-025-06828-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-025-06828-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-025-06828-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-025-06828-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:353:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10479-025-06828-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.