IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v351y2025i1d10.1007_s10479-024-06112-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis and improvement of the binary particle swarm optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Sameh Kessentini

    (Faculty of sciences of Sfax, University of Sfax)

Abstract

Solving binary-real problems with bio-inspired algorithms is an active research matter. However, the efficiency of the employed algorithm varies drastically by tailoring the governing equations or just by adopting “more adequate” parameter setting. Within this framework, we aim to improve the parameter setting of the binary particle swarm optimization (BPSO). We derive a Markov chain model of BPSO. The transition probabilities reveal that the acceleration coefficients control the transition speed between the exploitation and exploration phases. The transition probabilities also depict a poor exploration ratio in high-dimensional search spaces. Increasing the values of the acceleration coefficients may enhance the exploration ratio. Nevertheless, overly high values for these coefficients present some shortcomings. Numerical experiments realized on three different problem sets (e.g. multidimensional knapsack problem) further prove the need to increase the acceleration coefficients as the search space dimension rises. We recommend a set of equations governing the best setting for acceleration coefficients. Finally, a comparison with other BPSO variants reveals the merits of the suggested setting over the conventional ones.

Suggested Citation

  • Sameh Kessentini, 2025. "Analysis and improvement of the binary particle swarm optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 351(1), pages 101-131, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:351:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-024-06112-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-024-06112-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-024-06112-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-024-06112-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:351:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-024-06112-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.