IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v349y2025i2d10.1007_s10479-022-04664-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trade-in for cash or for new? Optimal pricing decisions under the government subsidy policy

Author

Listed:
  • Xin Guo

    (Shanghai University)

  • Xiaojun Fan

    (Shanghai University)

  • Shanshan Wang

    (Shanghai University)

Abstract

Businesses and governments have increasingly attached importance to trade-in programs due to their environmental and financial benefits. There are always two programs: trade-old-for-new (TON) and trade-old-for-cash (TOC). Compared with TON, TOC provides old consumers with more flexibility. However, TON may increase the new product sales for firms. In this study, we consider that the manufacturer implements a TON program and the third-party collector provides a TOC program. We study the optimal pricing and subsidy decisions and investigate the effects of the TON subsidy on the firms, consumers, and society. Our main results are: (1) It is optimal to set the new product price at a constant level, independent of the trade-in programs. (2) Consumers focus on the product durability level when they make purchase decisions and firms can improve demand for trade-ins by designing suitable product durability. (3) The TON subsidy benefits the manufacturer, consumers, and society, but hurts the third-party collector when the product durability level is low. Moreover, the effects of subsidy constraints depend on the upper limit of policy constraints and the product durability level. (4) The government subsidy is not as high as possible. A suitable subsidy level should be set according to the subsidy constraints. Our analysis provides insights for firms and government on how to use trade-in programs to maximize profits and social welfare.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin Guo & Xiaojun Fan & Shanshan Wang, 2025. "Trade-in for cash or for new? Optimal pricing decisions under the government subsidy policy," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 349(2), pages 1249-1276, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:349:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-022-04664-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-022-04664-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-022-04664-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-022-04664-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:349:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-022-04664-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.