Author
Abstract
The maximal covering subtree problem has applications in transportation network design and extensive facility location. A subtree of a network is a tree that is not a full spanning tree. Finding an optimal subtree may involve the two objectives, minimizing the total arc cost or distance of the subtree, and maximizing the subtree's coverage of population or demand at nodes. Coverage may be defined as direct or indirect: indirect coverage requires that a node be within a distance threshold s>0 of the subtree, and direct coverage requires that a node be connected to the subtree (s=0). Previous approaches to this problem have sought to identify optimal subtrees of a “parent” network that is itself a tree (e.g., a minimum spanning tree). In this paper four new bi-objective zero–one programming models are presented. The first two are models for the problem of finding optimal subtrees on a single spanning tree parent under conditions of (1) direct and (2) indirect coverage. These problems have been addressed previously in the literature. In the third and fourth models, the subtree can be selected from among multiple candidate parent spanning trees simultaneously. The latter models address a new generalization of the first problem and offer both increased flexibility and the potential for a more diverse array of solutions. The models have “integer-friendly” solution properties and are relatively small in terms of the number of decision variables and constraints. Computational experience is reported for a demonstration problem and results are compared to the results of previous models. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003
Suggested Citation
Justin Williams, 2003.
"Optimal Direct and Indirect Covering Trees,"
Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 123(1), pages 265-284, October.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:annopr:v:123:y:2003:i:1:p:265-284:10.1023/a:1026187616229
DOI: 10.1023/A:1026187616229
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:123:y:2003:i:1:p:265-284:10.1023/a:1026187616229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.