IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spi/ijetal/v9y2020i1p39-51id348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Case Study on How Children Develop Computational Thinking Collaboratively with Robotics Toys

Author

Listed:
  • Kay Yong Khoo

Abstract

This article reports on a case study on how robotics toys provide the affordances for developing computational thinking (henceforth abbreviated to CT) in young learners. The three key constructs of CT -abstraction, algorithms and automation - are used in the research. The study results identify how children interact with robotics toys collaboratively and acquire CT skills. Problems were presented to the children through planned non-routine and immersive collaborative group activities. The Situations in which they externalised their inquiries and internalised new knowledge were observed. A detailed examination of the data collected was made to determine which robotics toys mediated the children’s acquisition while seamlessly switching between individual and collaborative activities and has led to the development of a framework of the stages in CT learning designs. This paper synthesises the relevant classroom activity designs in addressing CT as a general term that involves solving problems, entails a whole set of mental tools that enable people to reduce complex problems into readily solvable subtasks and composes algorithms that are executable by machines. Moreover, the article will also include details and analyses of the selection of commercially available technologies for developing CT in the young learners in the study.

Suggested Citation

  • Kay Yong Khoo, 2020. "A Case Study on How Children Develop Computational Thinking Collaboratively with Robotics Toys," International Journal of Educational Technology and Learning, Scientific Publishing Institute, vol. 9(1), pages 39-51.
  • Handle: RePEc:spi:ijetal:v:9:y:2020:i:1:p:39-51:id:348
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://scipg.com/index.php/101/article/view/348/400
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spi:ijetal:v:9:y:2020:i:1:p:39-51:id:348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://scipg.com/index.php/101/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.