IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spi/ijetal/v6y2019i1p11-16id50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ensuring Content Representativeness: Perceptions of Senior High School Teachers in Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Asamoah
  • Benjamin Sundeme
  • Aaron Adusei
  • Moses K. K. Ocansey
  • William Ntiamoah Ntim

Abstract

For a meaningful classroom assessment to be feasible, teachers must ensure adequate content representativeness when crafting their items. The study sought to find out the perceptions of senior high school teachers on how well they ensure content representativeness in their classroom assessment procedures in Ghana. Underpinned by the theory of validity, the study used the qualitative research approach. The purposive sampling procedure was used to select a sample of 25 participants for the study. The interview guide was used to collect data for the study. The data was analysed manually using the thematic approach. The results of the study revealed that senior high school teachers least ensure content representativeness in their assessment procedures because they fail to develop and use a table of the test specification. In furtherance to this, the study showed that senior high school teachers do not consult measurement experts or curriculum planners to thoroughly judge the items the teachers craft in ensuring content representativeness. It is recommended among others that there should be the need for educating teachers on what table of a test specification is, and how to develop and use it.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Asamoah & Benjamin Sundeme & Aaron Adusei & Moses K. K. Ocansey & William Ntiamoah Ntim, 2019. "Ensuring Content Representativeness: Perceptions of Senior High School Teachers in Ghana," International Journal of Educational Technology and Learning, Scientific Publishing Institute, vol. 6(1), pages 11-16.
  • Handle: RePEc:spi:ijetal:v:6:y:2019:i:1:p:11-16:id:50
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://scipg.com/index.php/101/article/view/50/66
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spi:ijetal:v:6:y:2019:i:1:p:11-16:id:50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://scipg.com/index.php/101/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.