IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spi/ijetal/v5y2019i1p15-19id43.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect on Mathematical Learning Outcome by Modelling of Mathematic Learning and Cognitive Style of Junior High Students

Author

Listed:
  • Nurhamiyah .
  • Mustaji .
  • Suryaman .

Abstract

The objectives of this study are (1) to examine a difference between the learning outcome of junior high school students who participate in Realistic Mathematic Learning (RML) and expository, (2) to examine a difference between learning outcome of students who have cognitive style of Field Dependent (FD) and Field Independent (FI), and (3) to examine an interaction between the students who participate in RML and cognitive style on mathematical learning outcome. The study is conducted at two religion-based state junior high school in Surabaya, Indonesia. Data collecting instrument of cognitive style uses Withkin's Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT). The test is used to measure mathematical learning outcome. The results of study show a significance value on PMR of 0.001 < 0.05 with F-count = 10.715. For the significance value on cognitive style, it is obtained a significance value of 0.000 < 0.05 with F-count = 180.928. While the significance value on RML and cognitive style, it is obtained 0.013 < 0.05 with F-count = 6.311. So, it can be concluded that (1) there is the difference between learning outcome of students who participate in PMR model and expository learning, (2) there is the difference between learning outcome of the students who have a cognitive style of FD and FI, and (3) there is the interaction between RML model and cognitive style on students’ learning outcome.

Suggested Citation

  • Nurhamiyah . & Mustaji . & Suryaman ., 2019. "The Effect on Mathematical Learning Outcome by Modelling of Mathematic Learning and Cognitive Style of Junior High Students," International Journal of Educational Technology and Learning, Scientific Publishing Institute, vol. 5(1), pages 15-19.
    • Handle: RePEc:spi:ijetal:v:5:y:2019:i:1:p:15-19:id:43
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://scipg.com/index.php/101/article/view/43/59
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spi:ijetal:v:5:y:2019:i:1:p:15-19:id:43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://scipg.com/index.php/101/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.