IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/snr/mdrcmp/y2013i2p3-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using sociological methods to access the im pact of the public policy (a case of the merger notification)

Author

Listed:
  • Sushkevich, A.

  • Avdasheva, S.

  • Markin, M.

Abstract

The article is devoted to the ex-post evaluation of the merger approval and the remedy development by Russian competition authority - the Federal Antimonopoly Service (FAS) - using the results of interviews and a sample survey. The analyses and the decisions made by the FAS in several large merger deals completed in 2006-2008 are assessed. The authors explain the comparative advantages of different methods to assess the effects of the public policy employed in Russia, as well as alternative approaches for the evaluation of the effects of the mergers. The data of interviews and sample surveys allow to reject the hypothesis on the restriction of the competition as a result of the merger deals. At the same time the experts are skeptical towards the conditions in the merger remedies and their impact on the market competition.

Suggested Citation

  • Sushkevich, A. & Avdasheva, S. & Markin, M., 2013. "Using sociological methods to access the im pact of the public policy (a case of the merger notification)," Journal of Modern Competition, Synergy University, issue 2, pages 3-18.
    • Handle: RePEc:snr:mdrcmp:y:2013:i:2:p:3-18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.moderncompetition.ru/jour/article/view/534
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:snr:mdrcmp:y:2013:i:2:p:3-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Synergy University Maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/snrgunv.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.