IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/snr/mdrcmp/y2008i4p38-49.html

Socially unacceptable criterion used to choose an infra- structure-related concession bidding competition winner

Author

Listed:
  • Martusevich, R. A.

    (Institute for Business and Market Analysis, Higher School of Economics)

Abstract

Bidding competitions organized to identify the winner that gains the right to conclude a concession agreement are one of the forms of competition for the best market share and are the most important stage of a concession project-related organizational process development. The experience gained in different countries of the world of organizing the concession bidding competitions in various infrastructure-related sectors (power supply, water supply, transportation services, etc.) is large but the experience has shown that the competition result is not always justified as the inadequate criteria are used when choosing the winner. The article author shows the reasons why the state officials choose the maximal concession payment as the only criterion that can identify the best concession competition bidder.

Suggested Citation

  • Martusevich, R. A., 2008. "Socially unacceptable criterion used to choose an infra- structure-related concession bidding competition winner," Journal of Modern Competition, Synergy University, issue 4, pages 38-49.
    • Handle: RePEc:snr:mdrcmp:y:2008:i:4:p:38-49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.moderncompetition.ru/jour/article/view/178
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:snr:mdrcmp:y:2008:i:4:p:38-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Synergy University Maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/snrgunv.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.