Author
Listed:
- Anisimov, Alexander Yu.
(Synergy University)
- Tokmakova, Elena N.
(Synergy University)
- Trubin, Alexander E.
(Synergy University)
Abstract
The problem of choosing an effective project management methodology is one of the key tasks in the field of information systems development. In the modern world, software development is one of the most demanded types of project activities, and in almost every field of production specialized software (software) is used, which plays a central role in the functioning of enterprises. In this regard, the creation of an effective development process becomes the most important condition for the successful implementation of the project. Despite the existence of a large number of modern management methodologies, choosing the most appropriate one remains a difficult task that requires a detailed analysis of goals and criteria. The success of the project, both for the contractor and for the customer, largely depends on the correct choice of the management model. The purpose of the study is to analyze key aspects of software development management methodologies in highly competitive modern markets. The main objective of the study includes a comparative analysis of agile software development management methodologies. The article presents the results of a comparative analysis of existing agile methodologies. The expediency of using the Kanban methodology as a software development management tool is substantiated, and potential risks associated with choosing the optimal methodology are identified. The results obtained have both theoretical and practical significance, contributing to the informed choice of the most appropriate project management methodology in the field of IP development in modern highly competitive markets.
Suggested Citation
Anisimov, Alexander Yu. & Tokmakova, Elena N. & Trubin, Alexander E., 2024.
"Comparative analysis of Agile software development methodologies in modern highly competitive markets,"
Journal of Modern Competition, Synergy University, vol. 18(5), pages 111-123.
Handle:
RePEc:snr:mdrcmp:v:18:y:2024:i:5:p:111-123
DOI: 10.37791/2687-0657-2024-18-5-111-123
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:snr:mdrcmp:v:18:y:2024:i:5:p:111-123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Synergy University Maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/snrgunv.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.